16.06.2013 Views

1. Introduction - Firenze University Press

1. Introduction - Firenze University Press

1. Introduction - Firenze University Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

extraction process at 400 °C (~ 623 K) corresponds to an exergy equal to Ex(Q) = (1-T/T0)·Q = 9.1<br />

– 3.9 GJ/t-CO2. (T/T0)·Q is the exergy destruction, ED.<br />

Table 7. Energy (Q), exergy destruction (ED) and requirement (EQ) of the process in GJ/t-CO2<br />

246<br />

Q ED EQ<br />

Mg(OH)2 production<br />

Kiln 9.09 3.89 5.20<br />

DISS 0.48 0.46 0.02<br />

PREP1 <strong>1.</strong>10 <strong>1.</strong>06 0.04<br />

PREP 2 -10.5 -9.70 -0.84<br />

MVR Compressor <strong>1.</strong>18<br />

Sep-4 -0.89 -0.65 -0.24<br />

Heat exchangers -2.40 -<strong>1.</strong>73 -0.67<br />

Total -<strong>1.</strong>99 -6.67 4.68 #<br />

Mg(OH)2 Carbonation<br />

Turbine -0.24<br />

-0.24<br />

Heat exchangers -<strong>1.</strong>78 -<strong>1.</strong>22 -0.55<br />

Total -2.02 -<strong>1.</strong>22 -0.79<br />

Net<br />

3.88 #<br />

#<br />

These values are lowered by ~0.45 GJ/t-CO2 if the Fe form in mineral is assumed to be FeO<br />

instead of the Fe2O3 used here.<br />

The exergy destruction of a system, which is the measure of the amount by which the value of the<br />

resource is consumed or degraded, is shown as (8) while the exergy flow is presented in (9);<br />

(8)<br />

where (S-S0) is the entropy change, T0 is the ambient temperature and (H-H0) the enthalpy change.<br />

The results obtained here are compared with the results of a previous model [17] where no pinch<br />

analysis was done.<br />

The application of pinch analysis and the heat exchanger network as implemented in the Aspen Plus<br />

model (Fig.5) resulted in a ~ 0.5 Gt/t-CO2 (~ 10% points) reduction in the exergy requirement of<br />

producing Mg(OH)2. Mg(OH)2 carbonation unit provides ~ 17% points energy offset to the process.<br />

When the Mg(OH)2 production and carbonation units are integrated, the process requirements of the<br />

process becomes 3.88 Gt/t-CO2. This value becomes 3.4 GJ/t-CO2 (reducing by another ~0.5 GJ/t-<br />

CO2) if the compound form of Fe in mineral is assumed to be FeO instead of the Fe2O3 used here.<br />

5. Conclusions<br />

This paper investigated the influence that reaction parameters has on the production of Mg(OH)2 by<br />

analyzing the effects of Mg/Fe ratio, S/AS ratio, T and t on Mg extraction. Once produced Mg(OH)2<br />

could be used to sequester carbon by direct reaction with flue gases or CO2 derived from power or<br />

chemical plants. Notable among the results presented in this paper is the fact that olivine rocks are<br />

5x less as reactive as their serpentinite counterparts. It was also obvious that serpentinite rocks with<br />

Mg/Fe < 2.16 were less (>2x) reactive than others. This validates previous results which showed<br />

that an increase in Mg/Fe ratio increases Mg extraction. Reaction time has a significant effect on<br />

magnesium extraction as an increase in t above 25 minutes results in a 15 percent points’ increase in<br />

Mg extraction, but this effect tends to diminish after 60 min. On the other hand, Mg extraction<br />

shows a negative dependence on reaction temperature; T > 440 o C do not favor Mg extraction. This<br />

<strong>1.</strong>18<br />

(9)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!