20.06.2013 Views

Design Challenges: Avoiding the Pitfalls, winning the game - Xilinx

Design Challenges: Avoiding the Pitfalls, winning the game - Xilinx

Design Challenges: Avoiding the Pitfalls, winning the game - Xilinx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

on <strong>the</strong> board. Markets where high-performance<br />

FPGAs are used, such as wired<br />

and wireless networks, storage/servers,<br />

automotive, and aerospace/defense, also<br />

have aggressive power budgets. Let’s discuss<br />

a few applications where tight power<br />

budgets are critical.<br />

Wired Networks: Metro Aggregation<br />

Metro aggregation refers to <strong>the</strong> aggregation<br />

of access connections at central offices<br />

(COs) within a metropolitan area network<br />

(MAN). The equipment within each CO<br />

must operate continuously, placing a heavy<br />

burden on operational costs and <strong>the</strong> effective<br />

capacity of power supplies and air conditioning<br />

systems. Any means by which<br />

equipment vendors can help reduce total<br />

system power consumption equates to real<br />

benefits for service providers.<br />

The power budgets for <strong>the</strong> cards in a<br />

rack of metro aggregation equipment usually<br />

average 20-30W. The FPGAs used in<br />

<strong>the</strong>se boards consume 4-5W each, and<br />

many designs use multiple FPGAs.<br />

For example, power budgets for a<br />

multi-service provisioning platform line<br />

cards and FPGAs include:<br />

• 12-port DS3 card: 30W; FPGA = 4-<br />

5W<br />

• 4-port OC-12 card: 28W; FPGA<br />

= 4-5W<br />

• 12-port 10/100 Base-T card: 50W;<br />

FPGA = 4-5W<br />

• 32-port T1/E1 card: 9 W; FPGA<br />

= 2-3W<br />

Using Virtex-4 FPGAs in <strong>the</strong>se applications<br />

would dramatically benefit service<br />

providers’ operational costs. Each Virtex-4<br />

FPGA can save 1-5W when compared to<br />

competitive 90 nm FPGAs.<br />

Wired Networks: Metro Access<br />

Unlike <strong>the</strong> metro aggregation equipment<br />

deployed in COs, metro access equipment<br />

exists at <strong>the</strong> edge of <strong>the</strong> network. It is<br />

deployed outdoors, where air flow is limited<br />

and air conditioning is virtually non-existent.<br />

Example systems include passive optical<br />

networks (PONs), digital loop carriers<br />

(DLCs), and cable modem termination systems<br />

(CMTS). These systems operate continuously<br />

at temperatures often well above<br />

85°C, taking junction temperatures as high<br />

as 100°C. Transistor leakage current – and<br />

hence static power – increase with temperature.<br />

As a result, equipment vendors in this<br />

space are constrained by stringent power<br />

budgets (10 to 12W per card, 4 to 8W per<br />

FPGA) to ensure reliability.<br />

As power-sensitive as <strong>the</strong>se applications<br />

are, saving as little as 0.5W can make a<br />

design workable. Virtex-4 devices eliminate<br />

as much as 1-5W per FPGA, dramatically<br />

benefiting both equipment vendors<br />

and service providers.<br />

Wireless Base Stations<br />

Because of its quick deployment and low<br />

establishment costs, <strong>the</strong> growth of <strong>the</strong> cell<br />

phone market has overtaken <strong>the</strong> growth of<br />

fixed-telephony networks. Once again,<br />

service providers can measure <strong>the</strong> value of<br />

reduced power consumption in Virtex-4<br />

FPGAs both in terms of <strong>the</strong> mitigation of<br />

reliability issues (arising from <strong>the</strong> outdoor<br />

environment in which <strong>the</strong> base stations<br />

are deployed) as well as <strong>the</strong> reduction of<br />

operational expenditures.<br />

Service providers running a typical<br />

wireless base station network of 35,000<br />

units can save more than $1M per year<br />

just in electricity charges. Consider <strong>the</strong><br />

following power budgets:<br />

• 16 line cards/base station;<br />

1 FPGA/line card<br />

• Power budget/line card = 20W<br />

• FPGA power budget = 6W<br />

Based on an extremely conservative<br />

estimation of a 2W power reduction<br />

POWER MANAGEMENT<br />

Product acceptability, reliability, and profitability depend as<br />

much or more on power efficiency as <strong>the</strong>y do on performance.<br />

using Virtex-4 FPGAs, service providers<br />

would see a 32W power savings per base<br />

station, amounting to a savings of 1.12<br />

MW for <strong>the</strong> entire network. Using<br />

10¢/KWh, this saves about $1M per year<br />

for 35,000 base stations in <strong>the</strong> network.<br />

Cutting 32 watts per base station also<br />

impacts service providers’ bottom lines in<br />

<strong>the</strong> form of capital expenditure reductions<br />

for cooling equipment costs, battery backup<br />

costs, and power supply and power<br />

management costs.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The battle to deliver maximum performance<br />

at <strong>the</strong> lowest cost has taken center<br />

stage in <strong>the</strong> evolution of FPGAs. Today,<br />

customers are demanding minimum<br />

power expenditure as well. Power conservation<br />

impacts every budget, whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

technological or financial. Product acceptability,<br />

reliability, and profitability depend<br />

as much or more on power efficiency as<br />

<strong>the</strong>y do on performance. Besides offering a<br />

robust feature set, Virtex-4 FPGAs exhibit<br />

a real power consumption advantage.<br />

None<strong>the</strong>less, competition in <strong>the</strong> FPGA<br />

market does not end with 90 nm devices.<br />

Interesting new dynamics arise when<br />

moving into <strong>the</strong> 65 nm node and below.<br />

Fortunately for <strong>Xilinx</strong>, one inherent value<br />

of using triple-oxide technology is that it<br />

scales nicely with each new process.<br />

As for <strong>the</strong> value of embedding hard IP<br />

where appropriate, it is practically an<br />

industry axiom. <strong>Xilinx</strong> has incorporated<br />

<strong>the</strong> right amount of programmable<br />

embedded IP with programmable logic to<br />

make <strong>the</strong> whole solution more flexible,<br />

with higher performance and lower<br />

power. In <strong>the</strong> long term, customers will<br />

only use platform FPGAs that provide <strong>the</strong><br />

best performance and power.<br />

For more information about power<br />

budgets, seminars/tutorials, white papers,<br />

and power analysis/optimization tools,<br />

visit www.xilinx.com/virtex4/lowpower.<br />

Third Quarter 2005 Xcell Journal 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!