Bid #01-1112 Library and Reprographics Roofing ... - Citrus College

3.1.4 Verification of Applications for Payment. In accordance with Article 8 hereof, the Architect will
review the Contractor's Applications for Progress Payments and for Final Payment, verify the extent of
Work performed and the amount properly due the Contractor on such Application for Payment.
3.1.5 Rejection of Work. The Architect is authorized to reject Work which is defective or does not
conform to the requirements of the Contract Documents. Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or
advisable, additional inspections or testing of the Work may be conducted, whether or not such Work is
fabricated, installed or completed. Neither this authority of the Architect nor a decision made in good faith
by the Architect to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility to the
Contractor, Subcontractors, Material Suppliers, their agents or employees, or other persons performing
portions of the Work.
3.1.6 Architect’s Review of Submittals. The Architect will review and approve or take other appropriate
action upon the Contractor's Submittals, but only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with
the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. Review of Submittals is not conducted for the
purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other details such as dimensions and quantities,
or for substantiating instructions for installation or performance of equipment or systems, all of which
remain the responsibility of the Contractor as required by the Contract Documents. The Architect's review
of the Contractor's Submittals shall not relieve the Contractor of its obligations under the Contract
Documents. The Architect's review of Submittals shall not constitute approval of safety measures,
programs or precautions or, unless otherwise specifically stated by the Architect, of any construction
means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures. The Architect's approval of a specific item in a
Submittal shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component. The Architect's
review of Submittals will be conducted promptly so as not to delay or hinder the progress of the Work or the
activities of the Contractor, the District or the District's separate contractors while allowing sufficient time, in
the Architect's reasonable professional judgment, to permit adequate review of Submittals. The foregoing
notwithstanding, the Architect's review and return of Submittals will conform with the time limits and other
conditions, if any, set forth in the Specifications or the Submittal Schedule if the Submittal Schedule is
required by other provisions of the Contract Documents. The Architect’s review and return of Submittals
will normally require a minimum of twenty one (21) days from date of receipt of complete submittal.
Deferred approval submittals indicated in the Contract Documents require additional time for processing
and review of all submittals.
3.1.7 Changes to the Work; Change Orders. The Architect will prepare Change Orders and may
authorize minor changes in the Work in accordance with Article 9.9 hereof.
3.1.8 Completion. The Architect will conduct observations to determine the date(s) of interim
milestones, if any, and the dates of Substantial and Final Completion. The Architect will verify that the
Contractor has complied with all requirements of the Contract Documents and is entitled to receipt of Final
Payment.
3.1.9 Interpretation of Contract Documents. The Architect will interpret and decide matters concerning
the requirements of the Contract Documents on written request of either the District or the Contractor, or as
deemed necessary. The Architect's response to such requests will be made in writing with reasonable
promptness and within the time limits specified in the Contract Documents. Interpretations and decisions of
the Architect will be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and
will be in writing or in the form of drawings with transmittal letter. When making such interpretations and
decisions, the Architect will endeavor to secure faithful performance by both the District and the Contractor,
will not show partiality to either and will not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions so rendered in
good faith. The Architect's decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect will be final if consistent with the
intent expressed in the Contract Documents.
Citrus Community College District Bid Due Date: November 15, 2011 at 3:00: p.m.
Bid #01-1112 Library and Reprographics Roofing Project Page 43 of 96