30.06.2013 Views

Texte intégral / Full text (pdf, 20 MiB) - Infoscience - EPFL

Texte intégral / Full text (pdf, 20 MiB) - Infoscience - EPFL

Texte intégral / Full text (pdf, 20 MiB) - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7. Experimental Validation - Agoraphobia<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Do the characters seem friendly?<br />

User−centered Interest−centered User or Interest Random<br />

Figure 7.7: Graphical results to the assessment of character friendliness.<br />

in awareness perception in the random mode and a slight increase in the user or interest<br />

mode. This parameter however did not change throughout the different modes. It seems as<br />

though when characters look at each other and at the user randomly, users perceive that they<br />

are less aware of their environment. This may be explained by the fact that the characters<br />

seem not to be looking at the participant at all. This could equally be explained by the fact<br />

that there is no logic as to where or what the characters look at in this mode; the interest<br />

points are arbitrarily selected.<br />

Concerning the evaluation of character awareness towards other characters, the results<br />

were not what we expected. We expected the random mode to have the highest results.<br />

However, we can see in Figure 7.9 that the two which obtained the highest results were the<br />

interest-centered and the user or interest modes. It is normal for the user-centered to obtain<br />

the lowest score since the characters would only be looking at the user but not at the other<br />

characters. Those which scored highest though, were the modes in which character attention<br />

was divided between the user and other characters. Once again, the fact that there is no logic<br />

as to what the characters look at in the random mode seems to give the impression that they<br />

are not aware of one another.<br />

Finally, concerning character awareness towards the user, the user-centered mode scored<br />

slightly above the user or interest one, as depicted in Figure 7.10. We expected the usercentered<br />

mode to be clearly scored highest. The tendency however is the same as for the<br />

second question, which is in line with what we expected since both questions were alike.<br />

We have equally performed a Student’s T-test in order to verify whether there were any<br />

statistical significances between the various modes. The results are shown in Table 7.2. If<br />

we consider the 95% probability of significant difference between modes, we can see that<br />

the assessment of gaze (are the characters looking at you?) falls into this category for all<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!