07.08.2013 Views

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(1) The duty of disclosure has become part of the way the UK business<br />

insurance market works. For many business policies, there is no<br />

proposal form. Instead the broker presents the risk, <strong>and</strong> the underwriter<br />

relies on the broker <strong>and</strong> client to present that risk honestly. It would be<br />

possible to distinguish insurance that was preceded by a proposal form<br />

(whether a paper form or on a website) <strong>and</strong> insurance where there was<br />

no such form, <strong>and</strong> require disclosure only in the latter. However we would<br />

prefer not to set boundaries between types of insurance, as these always<br />

cause problems in marginal cases.<br />

(2) Business insurance involves a much greater variety of unusual risks than<br />

consumer insurance. That would make it harder for the insurer to ask<br />

questions about all relevant matters.<br />

(3) A greater proportion of business insurance is conducted through full-time<br />

professional intermediaries, who can advise as to what is required. This<br />

means that the risk of an insured not realising that it has a general duty<br />

to disclose is reduced.<br />

(4) Requiring insurers to ask questions even when both parties are<br />

sophisticated in insurance matters could lead to an empty formalism. If<br />

underwriters ask a general question such as “<strong>and</strong> finally, is there<br />

anything else that we should know about?” the duty would effectively be<br />

restored.<br />

5.28 We still think that it would be appropriate to expect insurers, as a matter of good<br />

practice, to warn insureds about the duty to disclose when it is reasonable to<br />

think that the insured may not be aware of the need, particularly on renewal. But<br />

we doubt it is necessary to provide a legal remedy, such as preventing the<br />

insurer from avoiding, for failure to do so.<br />

5.29 For these reasons, we think that the duty of disclosure should be retained, but its<br />

scope should be modified to protect those who act honestly <strong>and</strong> reasonably in all<br />

the circumstances. We explain this below.<br />

5.30 We provisionally propose that a duty of disclosure should continue to<br />

apply to business insurance contracts.<br />

PROTECTING THE HONEST AND CAREFUL INSURED<br />

5.31 Previously in this report we have outlined a general principle: an insured who was<br />

both honest <strong>and</strong> careful in giving pre-contract information should not have a claim<br />

turned down on the basis that the information was incorrect or incomplete. We<br />

think this should apply to business insurance as well as to consumers, at least in<br />

the absence of a clear <strong>and</strong> genuine agreement to the contrary.<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!