07.08.2013 Views

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“White labelling”: br<strong>and</strong>ing insurance products with the distributors’ name<br />

9.43 One particular trend has been towards joint ventures between insurers <strong>and</strong> “High<br />

Street names” (such as supermarkets, banks or building societies). The<br />

insurance is br<strong>and</strong>ed with the name of the supermarket (for example), so that<br />

only keen readers of documentation will realise that the insurer is a different<br />

organisation. 25<br />

9.44 For insurance sold by telephone, 26 we have been told that these partnerships<br />

often follow two basic models. In the first, consumers will be asked to ring a call<br />

centre run by the High Street name (such as the bank). The call centre will be<br />

empowered under the terms of their agreement with the underwriter to bind the<br />

underwriter to the cover. In these circumstances, the High Street name is clearly<br />

acting as agent for the insurer in asking questions, receiving information <strong>and</strong><br />

issuing cover.<br />

9.45 In the second model, however, consumers are told to ring a number that takes<br />

them through to a call centre operated by the insurer (though again, the call<br />

centre may be br<strong>and</strong>ed with the High Street name). It will therefore be the<br />

insurer’s responsibility to ask questions <strong>and</strong> advise consumers about the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard of care required in answering them. In these circumstances, often, the<br />

distributor will be a mere “introducer” – h<strong>and</strong>ing out leaflets about the product, but<br />

not advising on its suitability. From the distributor’s point of view, this has the<br />

advantage that it lessens the burden of FSA regulation.<br />

9.46 In the case of a leaflet in a supermarket this may work well. The consumer’s<br />

dealings will be entirely with the insurer <strong>and</strong> there should be no possibility of the<br />

distributor misleading them about the nature of the questions asked. However,<br />

things may go wrong. FSA research about investment products shows that<br />

introducers may well give advice about products, even though they should not<br />

(<strong>and</strong> equally advisers may not give advice, even though they should). 27 The same<br />

may occur in the insurance market.<br />

25<br />

ICOB rule 5.6 states that the insurance intermediary must clearly communicate the identity<br />

of the insurance undertaking to the customer. Although the information is available for<br />

those who wish to read it, many consumers react to an overall br<strong>and</strong>ing impression rather<br />

than the specific words of policy summaries <strong>and</strong> disclosure documents.<br />

26 The same models may occur in internet sales – the website may either be hosted by the<br />

distributor on behalf of the insurer, or by the insurer themselves. However, internet sales<br />

offer less scope for human error.<br />

27<br />

FSA, Depolarisation disclosure – mystery shopping results, Consumer Research Report 48<br />

(March 2006).<br />

226

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!