07.08.2013 Views

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.105 If the intermediary is authorised, a consumer or small business is able to pursue<br />

a complaint against them to the FOS. If the intermediary becomes insolvent, the<br />

consumer or small business may enforce the court or FOS award either against<br />

the intermediary’s insurer or against the Financial Services Compensation<br />

Scheme (discussed below). If the intermediary is an appointed representative,<br />

the policyholder may pursue a claim or complaint against the representative’s<br />

principal. 74<br />

9.106 Not all intermediaries will be covered, as some will fall within the exemptions. The<br />

most extensive exemption is for travel operators arranging travel insurance <strong>and</strong><br />

for product retailers arranging product insurance. If, for example, a small travel<br />

agent mis-sells travel insurance, a consumer will not be able to complain against<br />

them to the FOS. However, travel or product insurance rarely involves lengthy<br />

proposal forms: in our survey of FOS cases involving misrepresentation <strong>and</strong> nondisclosure<br />

issues, only 3% concerned travel insurance. Travel insurance is much<br />

more likely to lead to disputes about exclusions in the policy terms, 75 but that<br />

raises other issues. We are not aware of any cases where consumers have been<br />

unable to bring complaints against travel agents or product retailers who have<br />

filled in proposal forms incorrectly.<br />

9.107 Professions or businesses that give incidental information about insurance<br />

products are not meant to fill in forms or give advice about how to fill in forms. It is<br />

always possible that some will overstep the mark, <strong>and</strong> give advice that they are<br />

not meant to give. Where a vet exceeds their authority <strong>and</strong> mis-advises a<br />

consumer about how to fill in a form about pet insurance, the consumer would<br />

have no recourse to the FOS. However, we are not aware that this is a problem<br />

in practice.<br />

FSA requirements<br />

9.108 The FSA Rules require agents to disclose certain matters to their customers<br />

before concluding an initial insurance contract with them. The matters which must<br />

be disclosed include:<br />

(1) whether the firm is authorised <strong>and</strong> regulated by the FSA, or whether it is<br />

an appointed agent for another principal which is authorised <strong>and</strong><br />

regulated by the FSA;<br />

(2) details of any holding in the insurer, if this constitutes more than 10% of<br />

the voting rights or capital of the insurer; <strong>and</strong><br />

74 Under section 39(3) of the Financial Services <strong>and</strong> Markets Act, “the principal of an<br />

appointed representative is responsible, to the same extent as if he had expressly<br />

permitted it, for anything done or omitted by the representative in carrying on the business<br />

for which he has accepted responsibility”.<br />

75<br />

In our survey of 50 FOS cases involving disputes about policy terms, 14 (28%) involved<br />

travel insurance – the largest category in the survey: see Issues Paper 2, Warranties,<br />

Appendix B.<br />

242

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!