07.08.2013 Views

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

When the insurance intermediary informs the customer that he gives<br />

his advice on the basis of a fair analysis, he is obliged to give that<br />

advice on the basis of an analysis of a sufficiently large number of<br />

insurance contracts available on the market, to enable him to make a<br />

recommendation, in accordance with professional criteria, regarding<br />

which insurance contract would be adequate to meet the customer's<br />

needs.<br />

10.31 We would welcome views on whether the same test should be used for the<br />

purposes of distinguishing between insurer’s agents <strong>and</strong> insured’s agents. In<br />

other words, should only those intermediaries conducting a fair analysis of the<br />

market be treated as the consumer’s agent? The advantage of aligning the tests<br />

in this way is that it is simpler: the distinction already exists (albeit for other<br />

purposes) <strong>and</strong> customers must be told whether the intermediary is providing a<br />

fair analysis. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, it has been pointed out that offering independent<br />

advice is not the same as ensuring a proposal form is filled in correctly. An<br />

intermediary may offer independent advice but then become the insurer’s agent<br />

for the purposes of binding the insurer to cover. Alternatively, an intermediary<br />

may act for a consumer in completing a form without necessarily offering advice<br />

on which product to buy.<br />

10.32 We ask if the test for whether an intermediary is independent <strong>and</strong> acts as<br />

the consumer’s agent should depend on whether the intermediary searches<br />

the market <strong>and</strong> conducts “a fair analysis”, as defined by the Insurance<br />

Mediation Directive.<br />

10.33 As discussed above, we have considered whether special protection is needed<br />

for those dealing with intermediaries who are exempt from FSA regulation, such<br />

as travel agents selling travel insurance, 7 product retailers selling product<br />

insurance or businesses wrongly giving advice about incidental products. Our<br />

current view is that no additional protection is required. The issue does not<br />

appear to cause problems in practice, as (for example) it is rare for travel<br />

insurance to be avoided for non-disclosure or misrepresentation. Furthermore,<br />

product retailers <strong>and</strong> travel agents rarely carry out a fair analysis of the market,<br />

so they will usually be considered as agents for the insurer in any event.<br />

However, we would welcome views on this.<br />

10.34 We ask whether any additional protection is necessary when consumers<br />

have been given bad advice about completing proposal forms by<br />

intermediaries who are not subject to FSA regulation?<br />

7 On 26 June 2007, as this report was going to press, the Treasury announced that the sale<br />

of travel insurance alongside a holiday would be regulated by the FSA: see http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/newsroom_<strong>and</strong>_speeches/press/2007/press_71_07.cfm.<br />

256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!