07.08.2013 Views

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C.45 At one level stress is a normal part of life - <strong>and</strong> many people will at some stage<br />

mention the stresses they are under to their doctor. They will not necessarily<br />

think of this as a medical condition from which they are “suffering”, especially if it<br />

is a reaction to external events. For example, in Case 53 the insurer attempted to<br />

avoid the policy on the grounds that Mr C said he did not suffer from stress.<br />

However, his medical notes revealed that two years earlier an Occupational<br />

Health Nursing Officer reported that he had “raised stress levels” as his wife was<br />

depressed following her father’s death <strong>and</strong> he was coping with young children.<br />

The doctor had also entered one line saying Mr C was “stressed with early<br />

morning waking”. In Case 125 a woman had taken time off work for stress, but<br />

saw this as related to her matrimonial problems rather than her health.<br />

C.46 Backache is a particularly prevalent condition. One estimate suggests that it<br />

affects over a third of adults. 6 Several people in the survey failed to mention that<br />

they had previously suffered from backache if it was no longer a problem for<br />

them. In Case 55, for example, the policyholder failed to mention that she had<br />

experienced back pain following childbirth more than 5 years previously. In Case<br />

7 the policyholder asked her intermediary, <strong>and</strong> was told only to mention a<br />

problem that had occurred in the last 2 years.<br />

Questions relating to building <strong>and</strong> contents insurance<br />

C.47 In our survey, 27 cases related to contents insurance <strong>and</strong> 5 to building insurance,<br />

forming around a sixth of the total sample. In this context, most non-disclosure<br />

was about previous claims or losses (16 cases, 50%); or previous convictions (6<br />

cases, 19%). Other issues included subsidence (3 cases); locks <strong>and</strong> alarms; or<br />

the value of the contents.<br />

C.48 Household insurance proposal forms commonly ask questions along the following<br />

lines:<br />

Have any accidents, losses or claims arisen, whether insured or not?<br />

Have you or anyone living with you made a claim or had an incident<br />

which may have resulted in a claim or suffered loss, damage or<br />

liability during the last 5 years, whether insured or not?<br />

C.49 The survey revealed three issues with questions of this sort. First, people may<br />

not remember minor claims made more that three years previously; they may be<br />

unaware that other people living with them have made claims; or they may not<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> what is meant by “loss or damage” that does not result in a claim.<br />

C.50 If interpreted literally, “loss or damage” could cover any occasion on which a<br />

household item is lost or damaged, but few people would interpret the question in<br />

this way. In Case 11, for example, Mrs T’s young son had spilled c<strong>and</strong>le wax on<br />

the carpet. A few months later she had redecorated the room <strong>and</strong> replaced the<br />

carpet. The insurer attempted to argue that her failure to mention this incident<br />

when she renewed her insurance entitled them to avoid the policy, though the<br />

ombudsman ruled that the phrase “suffered loss” could not be intended to include<br />

all damage to a home caused by young children.<br />

6 See http://www.backcare.org.uk/backhealth/<br />

368

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!