07.08.2013 Views

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In such circumstances, it was also recommended that the insurer should not be<br />

entitled to pursue an alternative remedy for misrepresentation. 13<br />

Proposal <strong>and</strong> renewal forms<br />

A.25 The <strong>Commission</strong> recommended that proposal forms should contain clear, explicit<br />

<strong>and</strong> prominent warnings about the st<strong>and</strong>ard of answers required, the duty to<br />

volunteer information <strong>and</strong> the consequences of failing to meet these obligations. 14<br />

A copy of the completed proposal form should be provided to a policyholder after<br />

completion or as soon after as is reasonably practicable. 15<br />

A.26 In the event of a failure to meet these requirements, an insurer would be unable<br />

to rely on any non-disclosure by the policyholder — subject to the court having a<br />

discretion to allow the insurer to rely on the non-disclosure if the failure caused<br />

no prejudice to the policyholder.<br />

A.27 The <strong>Commission</strong> further recommended that if a policy had been initiated by the<br />

completion of a proposal form the insurer should only have a remedy for<br />

non-disclosure at renewal if it had taken the following steps:<br />

(1) Supplied the policyholder with copies of any information that the<br />

policyholder had previously submitted to the insurer.<br />

(2) Warned the policyholder of the importance of retaining such copies.<br />

(3) Warned the policyholder of the duty to volunteer information <strong>and</strong> the<br />

consequences of failing to meet this obligation.<br />

A.28 For policies not initiated by proposal form, only the third step was required.<br />

Anti-avoidance<br />

A.29 The <strong>Commission</strong> recommended measures to prevent insurers from avoiding the<br />

reforms.<br />

A.30 First, it thought that where a policyholder's failure to provide an insurer with<br />

information amounts to both a non-disclosure <strong>and</strong> a non-fraudulent<br />

misrepresentation, an insurer's rights would be limited to those — if any —<br />

available for non-disclosure. 16<br />

A.31 Secondly, it recommended measures to curb the use of “basis of the contract”<br />

clauses. 17 The <strong>Commission</strong> recommended that such clauses should be<br />

ineffective insofar as they seek to create warranties as to past or present fact.<br />

Rejected options<br />

A.32 The English <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> specifically rejected two further options for reform.<br />

13 As above, at paras 4.61 to 4.62 <strong>and</strong> 8.5.<br />

14 As above, at para 10.14.<br />

15 As above, at para 10.15.<br />

16 As above, at para 8.5.<br />

17 As above, at paras 7.8 to 7.11<br />

289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!