07.08.2013 Views

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(3) whether the firm has or will provide advice or information<br />

(a) on the basis of a fair analysis of the market; or<br />

(b) from a limited number of insurers; or<br />

(c) from a single insurer. 76<br />

9.109 The intermediary must also inform its clients if it holds money on behalf of the<br />

insurer. The relevant rule states that:<br />

Where a firm holds, or is to hold, money as agent for an insurance<br />

undertaking it must ensure that it informs those of its clients which are<br />

not insurance undertakings <strong>and</strong> whose transactions may be affected<br />

by the arrangement (whether in its terms of business, client<br />

agreements or otherwise in writing) that it will hold their money as<br />

agent of the insurance undertaking <strong>and</strong> if necessary the extent of<br />

such agency <strong>and</strong> whether it includes all items of client money or is<br />

restricted, for example, to the receipt of premiums. 77<br />

9.110 As we discussed above, some of these issues may be relevant to whether the<br />

intermediary acts for the insured or for the insurer for disclosure purposes. 78 If an<br />

intermediary provides advice to the insured on the basis of a fair analysis of the<br />

market, they are likely to act for the insured. If, however, they act as the insurer’s<br />

appointed representative they will typically be the insurer’s agent. But the<br />

information disclosed will often not determine the issue. As we have seen, it is<br />

unclear whether those who sell from a single insurer will be regarded as the<br />

insurer’s agents if they do not actively solicit business for the insurer. The<br />

position of those selling from a limited number of insurers is also uncertain.<br />

Furthermore, the fact that the intermediary holds money on behalf of the insurer<br />

may be some evidence of an agency agreement between them, but would not be<br />

determinative. FSA regulation does not require intermediaries to say for whom<br />

they act.<br />

9.111 Under ICOB 4.3.2 an intermediary is required to explain the potential impact of<br />

non-disclosure, but again there is no specific mention of the agency issue.<br />

9.112 The FSA Rules do not address the situation where an intermediary incorrectly<br />

completes a proposal form. Thus the rule in Newsholme is left unchanged.<br />

76 FSA H<strong>and</strong>book, ICOB 4.2.8R(6).<br />

77 FSA H<strong>and</strong>book, CASS 5.2.3(3).<br />

78 See para 9.22.<br />

243

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!