07.08.2013 Views

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 6 Case Study - Critical Illness Cover<br />

This implies that for Type 1 firms, in addition to the 13,410 claims that are<br />

currently paid, an additional 57 will be partially paid in future (we have<br />

assumed a 50% proportionate remedy in the absence of other data). For Type<br />

2 firms, an additional 98 will now be paid in full with a further 17 partially<br />

paid (50% proportion).<br />

6.2.2 Primary impact on Firms<br />

There is clearly a differential effect depending on the type of firm involved.<br />

For Type 1 firms, there is little effect given the fact that we have assumed that<br />

they already generally mimic the decisions of the FOS. Overall, we estimate<br />

that that the number of proportionate claims paid will increase by 57 – or<br />

equivalent to approximately 29 ‘full’ claims. Prior to the proposed reforms,<br />

Type 1 firms paid out 13,410 claims. This might be expected to increase by<br />

0.22% following the introduction of the reforms. Based on an average payout<br />

of £73,000, the total increase in the cost of claims is estimated to be £2.08<br />

million 28.<br />

For Type 2 firms, these proposals would be expected to have a significant<br />

effect given the fact that we have assumed that these firms currently ignore<br />

the decisions of the FOS. Overall, we estimate that that the number of<br />

proportionate claims paid will increase by 17. In addition to this, Type 2 firms<br />

are also estimated to pay an extra 98 full claims that they currently avoid.<br />

Prior to the proposed reforms, Type 2 firms paid out 640 claims. This might<br />

be expected to increase by 16.72% (to 747 claims) following the introduction<br />

of the reforms. Based on an average full payout of £73,000, the total increase<br />

in the cost of claims is estimated to be more than £7.77 million 29.<br />

6.2.3 Retention of Premiums<br />

The FOS states that where an insured acts fraudulently the premium may be<br />

retained by the firm. In practice this does not appear to happen <strong>and</strong> most<br />

firms do not appear to retain premiums in the case of deliberate or reckless<br />

misrepresentation (although we would be grateful for information from<br />

consultees on this point). The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> asks whether insurance<br />

companies should be permitted to retain the premiums paid by the insured in<br />

the case of deliberate <strong>and</strong> reckless misrepresentation. Given that this does not<br />

appear to be the practice at the moment, this will have an economic impact on<br />

firms.<br />

28 This is computed as follows: 57*(£36,500)= £2,080,500<br />

29 This is computed as follows: 98*(£73,000)+17*(£36,500)=£7,774,500<br />

London Economics<br />

June 2007 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!