07.08.2013 Views

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.77 If there are reasons to preserve an extended duty under section 19(a):<br />

(1) Should the remedy lie in damages against the intermediary, rather than<br />

in avoidance against the insured?<br />

(2) Should any information given in confidence by a third party be excepted<br />

from the scope of the duty?<br />

(3) Should the duty be curtailed to information received in the course of the<br />

relevant transaction? (10.52)<br />

PRE-CONTRACT INFORMATION AND INTERMEDIARIES: BUSINESS<br />

INSURANCE PROPOSALS<br />

12.78 We provisionally propose that, in a business context, an intermediary should be<br />

regarded as acting for an insurer for the purposes of obtaining pre-contract<br />

information, if it deals with only a limited number of insurers <strong>and</strong> does not search<br />

the market on the insured’s behalf. (10.59)<br />

12.79 For businesses using other intermediaries, the issue of whom the intermediary is<br />

acting for in respect of disclosure issues should be left to the common law.<br />

(10.60)<br />

12.80 We provisionally propose that in the business context, an intermediary who would<br />

normally be regarded as acting for the insurer in obtaining pre-contract<br />

information remains the insurer’s agent while completing a proposal form. (10.62)<br />

12.81 We provisionally propose that a business insured’s signature on a proposal form<br />

that has been completed incorrectly by a third person should not be regarded as<br />

conclusive evidence that the insured knew of or adopted what was written on the<br />

form. However, this should not reduce the effect of a warranty of fact given by a<br />

business insured. (10.64)<br />

12.82 We provisionally propose that where a broker breaches section 19(a), the insurer<br />

should no longer be entitled to avoid the policy against the insured. Instead a<br />

remedy in damages should lie against the broker. (10.73)<br />

12.83 We ask whether:<br />

(1) The right to damages should apply whenever insurance contracts are<br />

placed within the UK, or only where the contract is subject to the law of a<br />

part of the UK?<br />

(2) Producing brokers should be obliged to pass relevant information up the<br />

chain to the placing broker?<br />

(3) The law should specifically state that an intermediary is not required to<br />

disclose information given to it in confidence by a third party? (10.74)<br />

282

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!