07.08.2013 Views

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach ... - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GENERAL INSURANCE STANDARDS COUNCIL<br />

A.51 In July 2000, a voluntary regulator was established for general insurance.<br />

Membership was open to insurers <strong>and</strong> intermediaries. Regulation was based on<br />

two codes - the GISC Private Customer Code for consumer insurances <strong>and</strong> the<br />

GISC Commercial Code for business insurances.<br />

THE PAT SAXTON MEMORIAL LECTURE 2001<br />

A.52 In March 2001 Lord Justice Longmore gave the Pat Saxton Memorial Lecture. He<br />

took the opportunity to propose a new Insurance Contracts Act, dealing with,<br />

amongst other issues, misrepresentation <strong>and</strong> non-disclosure. He made a number<br />

of suggestions for reform.<br />

Test of materiality<br />

A.53 Lord Justice Longmore identified a number of possible formulations for the test of<br />

materiality, <strong>and</strong> expressed support for a formulation that depends on what the<br />

reasonable insured would think was material. He has since said judicially:<br />

Remedies<br />

Is it not time that the law was changed at least to the extent that an<br />

insured’s disclosure obligation should be to disclose matters which<br />

the insured knows are relevant to the insurer’s decision to accept the<br />

risk or which a reasonable assured could be expected to know are<br />

relevant to that decision? 21<br />

A.54 He suggested that the courts might be given a discretion to adjust the respective<br />

responsibilities of insured <strong>and</strong> insurer instead of allowing avoidance:<br />

It would, of course, lead to some uncertainty but that, after all, was a<br />

reason against the introduction of the concept of contributory<br />

negligence which, in the event, is a concept that has worn the test of<br />

time very well. In these days when the incidence of costs in litigation<br />

may depend on well or ill informed guesses made by the litigant, at<br />

the time they are obliged to serve pre action protocols, uncertainty is<br />

endemic, yet the court, <strong>and</strong> litigants, are quite good at getting used to<br />

it. Moreover, the Insurance Ombudsman Bureau apparently uses its<br />

discretion on occasion to apportion the loss <strong>and</strong> appears to have no<br />

difficulty with the concept.<br />

THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000<br />

COB<br />

A.55 One of the earliest acts of the Labour government formed in May 1997 was an<br />

announcement that it intended to introduce statutory regulation for the financial<br />

services industry with a single regulator – the Financial Services Authority<br />

(“FSA”). This new system was introduced in 2001 under the Financial Services<br />

<strong>and</strong> Markets Act 2000 ("FiSMA").<br />

21<br />

North Star Shipping Ltd v Sphere Drake Insurance plc [2006] EWCA Civ 378, [2006] 2<br />

Lloyd’s Rep 183, at [53].<br />

293

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!