Hydrogen Fuel Cell Bus Technology State of the ... - NEXTHYLIGHTS
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Bus Technology State of the ... - NEXTHYLIGHTS
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Bus Technology State of the ... - NEXTHYLIGHTS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Hydrogen</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>Cell</strong> <strong>Bus</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Art Review<br />
Millions €<br />
Hybrid fuel cell bus capital cost : 2010 - 2030 cost projection summary<br />
1.8<br />
1.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
Averaged costs<br />
2010 - 2014<br />
Averaged costs<br />
2015 - 2018<br />
Costs projections based on a set <strong>of</strong><br />
assumptions – please refer to Table 8<br />
Averaged costs<br />
2018 - 2022<br />
Averaged costs<br />
~ 2030<br />
150kW FC bus (2010- 2014)<br />
75kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (2010 - 2014)<br />
150kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (2015 - 2018)<br />
75kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (2015 - 2018)<br />
150kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (2018 -2022)<br />
75kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (2018-2022)<br />
150kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (~ 2030)<br />
75kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (~ 2030)<br />
Figure 20 Hybrid fuel cell cost over time as suggested by Figure 15, Figure 16 and<br />
Figure 19. <strong>Bus</strong>es cost is expressed at 2010 money value.<br />
Our survey identified two competing views within <strong>the</strong> industry on how bus fuel cell<br />
systems might be affected by <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> passenger car segment. These views<br />
can be summarised as it follows:<br />
Dedicated bus stack led:<br />
<strong>Fuel</strong> cell system manufacturers foresee that specialised systems for buses will<br />
continue to have a role, independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> car segment. This option would imply<br />
more costly fuel cell systems but with extended warranty – e.g. up to 20,000 hours or<br />
more by 2015/20.<br />
Led by passenger car stack development:<br />
The alternative is to see fuel cell systems sharing highly standardised components<br />
with passenger car stacks. This option would imply cheap fuel cell systems but with<br />
reduced life (as passenger car lifetime requirements are lower than those for heavy<br />
duty buses). This view would favour cheap bus fuel cell systems to be frequently<br />
swapped.<br />
Remark:<br />
According to European bus operators, both philosophies are acceptable as long as <strong>the</strong>y<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer same economic benefit on a total cost <strong>of</strong> ownership (TCO) basis.<br />
Generally speaking, as bus operators are already used to frequently replacing bus<br />
components, <strong>the</strong>re are no major logistical problems in dealing with less durable fuel cell<br />
systems, provided replacement rates do not exceed one stack swap per year.<br />
45