08.08.2013 Views

Hydrogen Fuel Cell Bus Technology State of the ... - NEXTHYLIGHTS

Hydrogen Fuel Cell Bus Technology State of the ... - NEXTHYLIGHTS

Hydrogen Fuel Cell Bus Technology State of the ... - NEXTHYLIGHTS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Hydrogen</strong> <strong>Fuel</strong> <strong>Cell</strong> <strong>Bus</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Art Review<br />

Millions €<br />

Hybrid fuel cell bus capital cost : 2010 - 2030 cost projection summary<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

Averaged costs<br />

2010 - 2014<br />

Averaged costs<br />

2015 - 2018<br />

Costs projections based on a set <strong>of</strong><br />

assumptions – please refer to Table 8<br />

Averaged costs<br />

2018 - 2022<br />

Averaged costs<br />

~ 2030<br />

150kW FC bus (2010- 2014)<br />

75kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (2010 - 2014)<br />

150kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (2015 - 2018)<br />

75kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (2015 - 2018)<br />

150kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (2018 -2022)<br />

75kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (2018-2022)<br />

150kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (~ 2030)<br />

75kW FC <strong>Bus</strong> (~ 2030)<br />

Figure 20 Hybrid fuel cell cost over time as suggested by Figure 15, Figure 16 and<br />

Figure 19. <strong>Bus</strong>es cost is expressed at 2010 money value.<br />

Our survey identified two competing views within <strong>the</strong> industry on how bus fuel cell<br />

systems might be affected by <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> passenger car segment. These views<br />

can be summarised as it follows:<br />

Dedicated bus stack led:<br />

<strong>Fuel</strong> cell system manufacturers foresee that specialised systems for buses will<br />

continue to have a role, independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> car segment. This option would imply<br />

more costly fuel cell systems but with extended warranty – e.g. up to 20,000 hours or<br />

more by 2015/20.<br />

Led by passenger car stack development:<br />

The alternative is to see fuel cell systems sharing highly standardised components<br />

with passenger car stacks. This option would imply cheap fuel cell systems but with<br />

reduced life (as passenger car lifetime requirements are lower than those for heavy<br />

duty buses). This view would favour cheap bus fuel cell systems to be frequently<br />

swapped.<br />

Remark:<br />

According to European bus operators, both philosophies are acceptable as long as <strong>the</strong>y<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer same economic benefit on a total cost <strong>of</strong> ownership (TCO) basis.<br />

Generally speaking, as bus operators are already used to frequently replacing bus<br />

components, <strong>the</strong>re are no major logistical problems in dealing with less durable fuel cell<br />

systems, provided replacement rates do not exceed one stack swap per year.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!