This environmental impact assessment for Kriegers flak ... - Vattenfall

More documents

Recommendations

Info

and the track at low visibility is at the same low level as in Kalmarsund. At the already built offshore turbines (Utgrunden I, Yttre Stengrund, Horns Rev and Nysted), this estimate would mean that approximately 45 water fowl would collide and die annually. If we also include the seven farms being planned (Klasården, Kriegers Flak I and II, Utgrunden 2, Lillgrund, Kårehamn and Rödsand syd), then, according to these estimates, further approximately 98 water fowl will be killed, which would mean a total of 0,007% of the Eider ducks in the Baltic Sea population. There are, however, at least 3-4 mil- Number of migrating birds and risk of collision Existing wind farms Country Number of turbines Km:s with turbines CUMULATIVE EFFECTS 151 lion water fowl who annually migrate over this part of the south-western Baltic and the estimate has been made under the assumption that the birds killed are Eider ducks, which therefore also is the worst-case scenario. The above-calculated risk of collision is very low in terms of population levels and the impact on the development of the population should therefore be seen as small and insigniÞ cant. The results from the study at Kalmarsund (Pettersson 2004) show that the ß ocks of water fowl mainly ß y at the side of the turbines, which means that they ß y 1,2 km further, which constitutes 0,2-0,4 % of the total Total migrating waterfowl Spring Autumn Birds/km windpark Number of accidents Total migrating waterfowl Birds/km windpark Number of accidents Utgrunden1 SV 7 3 500 000 40 000 4 800 000 13 300 0,1 Yttre Stengrund SV 5 1 50 000 8 000 0,1 650 000 100 000 10 Horns Rev DK 80 7 40 000 4 000 1 75 000 8 000 6 Nysted DK 72 6 250 000 25 000 5 300 000 30 000 18 Total existing farms 164 17 10 34 Planned wind farms Country Number of turbines Km:s with turbines Total migrating waterfowl Birds/km windpark Number of accidents Total migrating waterfowl Birds/km windpark Number of accidents Klasgården SV 16 2,5 7 000 2 000 0,2 11 000 1 500 0,4 Utgrunden 2 SV 24 5 500 000 10 000 2 800 000 9 000 0,1 Lillgrung SV 48 6,5 100 000 10 000 2 130 000 11 000 7 Kriegers Flak SV SV 128 15 1 200 000 20 000 10 1 500 000 25 000 38 Kriegers Flak TY TY 80 7 1 200 000 20 000 5 1 500 000 25 000 18 Kårehamn SV 21 7 15 000 2 000 0,5 30 000 1 500 1 Rödsand syd DK 40 10 250 000 10 000 3,5 300 000 10 000 10 Total planned farms 357 53 23 75
152 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ß ight stretch from their winter quarters in Denmark to the average hatching areas in the Stockholm archipelago. For a ß ock of birds that is forced to ß y around the Swedish farm at Kriegers Flak, the distance could be Þ ve or even seven kilometres longer than if they were to ß y straight, which could be up to 0,9 % farther. A ß ock of water fowl that is affected by three of four different, future, offshore wind farms, may have their ß ight distance increased by up to 30 km, which could be as much as a 3,8% ß ight increase. Even this does probably not have a very big impact on the individual bird, as most water fowl have a reserve of at least 10-20 % for longer ß ying distances to their average hatching or hibernation areas. This increase in energy cost for some individuals may over time have a large impact if a number of farms, especially large farms, are built in the water fowl migration tracks. The full cumulative study can be found in Attachment 8.4.
Page 1 and 2:
This environmental impact assessmen
Page 3 and 4:
Sweden Offshore Wind AB Hammarby Fa
Page 5 and 6:
CONTENTS 8.3 Comparative discussion
Page 7 and 8:
CONTENTS 12.10 Recreation and outdo
Page 9 and 10:
6 PREAMBLE AND READER NOTES 1. Prea
Page 11 and 12:
8 PREAMBLE AND READER NOTES Here, t
Page 13 and 14:
10 SUMMARY 2. Summary Introduction
Page 15 and 16:
12 SUMMARY any protected values or
Page 18 and 19:
Background
Page 20 and 21:
have less impact on the landscape p
Page 22 and 23:
Consultation Report
Page 24 and 25:
through Ms. Eva-Lena Olsson and Mr.
Page 26 and 27:
Description of the Wind Farm
Page 28 and 29:
5.2. Localisation The designated ar
Page 30 and 31:
As examples, the technique behind t
Page 32 and 33:
not yet been tested by the wind pow
Page 34 and 35:
) Biological surveys Extensive inve
Page 36 and 37:
During the construction phase, the
Page 38 and 39:
The wind turbines emit an aerodynam
Page 40 and 41:
trical and will therefore not conta
Page 42 and 43:
Project economics
Page 44 and 45:
Time table
Page 46 and 47:
Alternative locations
Page 48 and 49:
there are technical and economic li
Page 50 and 51:
Miscellaneous An application for th
Page 52 and 53:
ased on data measured in 2003. Cond
Page 54 and 55:
heritage, meaning that any exploita
Page 56 and 57:
mentary seabed is mobile due to ice
Page 58 and 59:
Alternative layout/scope
Page 60 and 61:
sary. An example that has been stud
Page 62 and 63:
The Zero Alternative
Page 64:
• The mining of approximately 840
Page 67 and 68:
64 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA 11. Pre
Page 69 and 70:
66 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA 11.1.1
Page 71 and 72:
68 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA varies
Page 73 and 74:
70 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA 1995).
Page 75 and 76:
72 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA cont. f
Page 77 and 78:
74 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA The win
Page 79 and 80:
76 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA Month T
Page 81 and 82:
78 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA Species
Page 83 and 84:
80 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA regular
Page 85 and 86:
82 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA The cod
Page 87 and 88:
84 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA 11.6.3
Page 89 and 90:
86 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA Distrib
Page 91 and 92:
88 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA to acqu
Page 93 and 94:
90 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA Of the
Page 95 and 96:
92 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA Bird sp
Page 97 and 98:
94 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA Night a
Page 99 and 100:
96 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA d) Surv
Page 101 and 102:
98 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA During
Page 103 and 104: 100 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA Indivi
Page 105 and 106: 102 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA tion w
Page 107 and 108: 104 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA In the
Page 109 and 110: 106 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA Since
Page 111 and 112: 108 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA Shippi
Page 113 and 114: 110 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA 11.11.
Page 115 and 116: 112 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA These
Page 117 and 118: 114 PRESENTATION OF THE AREA to pre
Page 119 and 120: 116 CONSEQUENSES OF THE WIND FARM 1
Page 121 and 122: 118 CONSEQUENSES OF THE WIND FARM I
Page 129 and 130: 126 CONSEQUENSES OF THE WIND FARM s
Page 131 and 132: 128 CONSEQUENSES OF THE WIND FARM
Page 135 and 136: 132 CONSEQUENSES OF THE WIND FARM J
Page 139 and 140: 136 CONSEQUENSES OF THE WIND FARM c
Page 141 and 142: 138 CONSEQUENSES OF THE WIND FARM A
Page 143 and 144: 140 CONSEQUENSES OF THE WIND FARM I
Page 145 and 146: 142 CONSEQUENSES OF THE WIND FARM p
Page 152 and 153: Cumulative effects
Page 156 and 157: 13.3 Current conditions/ saltwater
Page 158 and 159: Control program
Page 160 and 161: 14.2 Fish The wind farm’s possibl
Page 162 and 163: Collected judgement
Page 164: 15.3.2 The operational phase The fa
Page 167 and 168: 164 CABLE LAYING 16. Cable laying I
Page 169 and 170: 166 CABLE LAYING 16.2 Design The tr
Page 171 and 172: 168 CABLE LAYING There will be rest
Page 173 and 174: 170 BIBLIOGRAPHY 17. Bibliography A
Page 175 and 176: 172 BIBLIOGRAPHY ratoriet, Lysekil.
Page 177 and 178: 174 FTABLE OF ATTACHMENTS 19. Table
Page 179 and 180: 1 Wind farm, view from Trelleborg,
Page 181 and 182: Wind farm, view from Trelleborg, 30
Page 183 and 184: Wind farm, view from ships bridge,
Page 185 and 186: 7 Wind farm, view from Møn, 30 km,
Page 187: 9 Wind farm, view from Rügen, 42 k
show all

This environmental impact assessment for Kriegers flak ... - Vattenfall

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?