23.10.2012 Views

View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2.4<br />

100<br />

mixed effect models are used to calculate posterior probabilities of treatment response.<br />

The methods result in a dynamic individualized update of the prediction of<br />

response. The approaches were applied to data on the peginterferon treatment of<br />

chronic hepatitis B and their predictive performance were compared.<br />

The modelling approaches are very flexible in that they allow inclusion of more than<br />

one biomarker. The biomarkers may be described by complex mixed modelling if<br />

necessary, however one has to be aware not to overfit. For the indirect approach<br />

splines were used to describe the decline of viral load and ALT of a hepatitis B patient.<br />

Instead of linear mixed models, non-linear mixed models might be considered<br />

or ordinal distributed biomarkers might be modelled. Fieuws et al. 15 studied multivariate<br />

longitudinal profiles allowing a joint distribution of the random effects. They<br />

further16 used non-linear mixed of longitudinal profiles designing a set of classification<br />

rules. Komárek et al. 17 relaxed the normal assumption of the random effects<br />

biomarkers studying a heteroscedastic multivariate normal mixture for the random<br />

effects. The direct approach with the observed biomarkers enables as the term say<br />

direct inclusion of any marker, ordinal or non-linear as well as inclusion of interaction<br />

over time.<br />

The indirect method and the direct method, which uses the parameters describing<br />

the patterns of the biomarkers over time, have one small drawback being the computational<br />

programming, which is elaborate and time consuming and new estimates<br />

need to be established for a future subject before predictions can be calculated. In<br />

contrast, standard statistical procedures are available for the direct method of the<br />

observed markers and a prediction model can be expressed7 which directly can be<br />

applied to a future subject. This model though, has limited memory of the patterns<br />

of the biomarkers (depending on inclusion of the markers at previous visits), which<br />

can be an advantage in the situation were the last observed biomarkers predicts<br />

the outcome well, and a disadvantage if the prediction of the outcome is better<br />

associated with the total pattern of the markers. In the situation of response of<br />

peginterferon treatment the last observed load predicts just as well as the estimated<br />

decline.<br />

In our situation we studied a binary outcome. Brant and Morrell used the indirect<br />

method in several clinical studies. 9,10,18 Especially they focused on longitudinal<br />

measurements of the prostate specific antigen to predict prostate cancer. They<br />

observe more than two outcome categories (ex. no cancer, low risk, high risk) and<br />

constructs an elegant stopping rule depending on posterior probabilities over time.<br />

Our clinical situation is simpler, but therefore also allows us to easily study different<br />

stopping rules. In case of more than two outcome categories a generalized logit

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!