View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 2.4<br />
100<br />
mixed effect models are used to calculate posterior probabilities of treatment response.<br />
The methods result in a dynamic individualized update of the prediction of<br />
response. The approaches were applied to data on the peginterferon treatment of<br />
chronic hepatitis B and their predictive performance were compared.<br />
The modelling approaches are very flexible in that they allow inclusion of more than<br />
one biomarker. The biomarkers may be described by complex mixed modelling if<br />
necessary, however one has to be aware not to overfit. For the indirect approach<br />
splines were used to describe the decline of viral load and ALT of a hepatitis B patient.<br />
Instead of linear mixed models, non-linear mixed models might be considered<br />
or ordinal distributed biomarkers might be modelled. Fieuws et al. 15 studied multivariate<br />
longitudinal profiles allowing a joint distribution of the random effects. They<br />
further16 used non-linear mixed of longitudinal profiles designing a set of classification<br />
rules. Komárek et al. 17 relaxed the normal assumption of the random effects<br />
biomarkers studying a heteroscedastic multivariate normal mixture for the random<br />
effects. The direct approach with the observed biomarkers enables as the term say<br />
direct inclusion of any marker, ordinal or non-linear as well as inclusion of interaction<br />
over time.<br />
The indirect method and the direct method, which uses the parameters describing<br />
the patterns of the biomarkers over time, have one small drawback being the computational<br />
programming, which is elaborate and time consuming and new estimates<br />
need to be established for a future subject before predictions can be calculated. In<br />
contrast, standard statistical procedures are available for the direct method of the<br />
observed markers and a prediction model can be expressed7 which directly can be<br />
applied to a future subject. This model though, has limited memory of the patterns<br />
of the biomarkers (depending on inclusion of the markers at previous visits), which<br />
can be an advantage in the situation were the last observed biomarkers predicts<br />
the outcome well, and a disadvantage if the prediction of the outcome is better<br />
associated with the total pattern of the markers. In the situation of response of<br />
peginterferon treatment the last observed load predicts just as well as the estimated<br />
decline.<br />
In our situation we studied a binary outcome. Brant and Morrell used the indirect<br />
method in several clinical studies. 9,10,18 Especially they focused on longitudinal<br />
measurements of the prostate specific antigen to predict prostate cancer. They<br />
observe more than two outcome categories (ex. no cancer, low risk, high risk) and<br />
constructs an elegant stopping rule depending on posterior probabilities over time.<br />
Our clinical situation is simpler, but therefore also allows us to easily study different<br />
stopping rules. In case of more than two outcome categories a generalized logit