23.10.2012 Views

View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

View PDF Version - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION<br />

Dynamic prediction of response using longitudinal profi les 81<br />

Dynamic updating of an individuals prediction of a specific outcome based on new<br />

gathered information is not routinely implemented in prediction models, but can be<br />

of great importance for the individual patient, for the clinician and the further choice<br />

of treatment. We shall introduce the general problem in the setting of therapeutic<br />

treatment of chronic hepatitis B.<br />

In the last years treatment options for chronic hepatitis B have largely been extended.<br />

Still the virus is very difficult to eliminate and only 10-36% of the treated patients<br />

remains in remission after therapy. 1,2 Peg-interferon (PEG-IFN) has proven effective,<br />

but also has its limitations regarding multiple and possible serious side-effects. 3<br />

However, it has been demonstrated that the response to a course of interferon is<br />

durable and leads to both improved survival and reduction of the incidence of hepatocellular<br />

carcinoma. 3,4 Therefore, prediction of response to PEG-IFN is of great<br />

importance. During therapy the patient is monitored at frequently scheduled followup<br />

visits and several markers are measured to anticipate continuation. Different<br />

patterns of these markers have been described, ter Borg et al. 5 , and also flares<br />

(sudden increase) of markers have been identified as possible predictors of response,<br />

Flink et al. 6 Up to now however, these measurements have not been implemented<br />

routinely to update the individual prediction of response. These may even proof<br />

helpful in guiding and supporting the patient through the long treatment and identify<br />

patients who will have little benefit by continuation of treatment. The above<br />

sketched situation is the inspiration of this paper.<br />

Our aim is to develop a dynamic prediction model to update the prognosis of the<br />

individual patient dependent on the new information that becomes available after<br />

each follow-up visit. The statistical challenge is to find a powerful tool to make use<br />

of the multivariate longitudinal profiles to predict the binary outcome variable. We<br />

introduce a new method and elaborate on existing methods. The performance of<br />

the different methods are furthermore extensively compared. Two different views<br />

are considered: (1) directly modeling the prediction of the outcome variable with<br />

the use of logistic regression techniques with repeated updates and (2) indirectly<br />

classifying individuals into an outcome category over time using Bayes’ theorem.<br />

For the direct approach (1) either the observed marker value or the subject specific<br />

pattern of the marker is used as predictor. We suggest a GEE solution directly<br />

entering the observed marker values. 7 In contrast, Maruyama et al. 8 first fitted a<br />

linear mixed effect model to obtain the subject specific patterns of the longitudinal<br />

markers and then entered the estimated random effects in a logistic regression.<br />

Since the estimated random effects have measurement errors an adjustment of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!