Untitled - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative
Untitled - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative
Untitled - Memorial University's Digital Archives Initiative
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
!II . /-f() 0<br />
ROHANCE OF THE LAW COUFTS - POLITICAL & SOCIAL<br />
PROSECUTIOr-: OF THE LOrmON "GLOREI! 1915 _ THE PART<br />
PIAJED IN A NE',wOUNOy,IW LIll EL SUIT SI XTY YEARS AGO<br />
The prosecution by the Br itish Government a rev days ago, of the London<br />
Globe, recalls the historic l i be l<br />
suit of Tobin V8 Shea , t r i ed in the Supreme<br />
Court at St. John's in the l a t e fifties, and<br />
arising out of the publication 1n<br />
the "Nevfoundkender-" of an extract from the above paper. Compared \lith 'What is<br />
printed and published wh ole sal e today, the wor d s seem almost harmless and more<br />
likely to provoke mirth than anger, but the man who constituted the public life<br />
of those days, took matters more seriously, and perhaps 'Were more combative , and<br />
put up with l e s s than the ordinary citizen does today.<br />
The actual libel,<br />
or article comp'ladned of, ve e 'Written by Father Prout, the<br />
ve.LL-knovn author of t.he "Bells of Shand on'",<br />
vh o at that time was the Paris correapondent,<br />
of the London G'Lobej<br />
it was published in the London edition of that<br />
paper,<br />
and republished here i n t he Newfoundlander, at that t i me owned and edited<br />
__by . .tbe...late-Sir_Edw:lXd-..s~ , _.t hen _8 : membe Z'.-o~th~cuti.v.e.,..,.G~ ,...,.and-l:eprasent .,.. ~ ---= ==<br />
ing Ferryland District i n the Legislature .<br />
The plaintiff, the Han . Jamal'! Tobin,<br />
at the time of t he publica t i on of the libel, V8S F'i.na ncdnI Secr e t ar y of the Colony,<br />
~S~d;:~~:f~s~tffF;~tJ~ ~~,1~~Ci~Il;~~~d~~{~i;~rt l6f_-~h~~$;; - f-~ '::ck'l mae;~tt<br />
hat the publication of the word s complained of led to his dismissal from<br />
that<br />
office . The suit cannot be regarded as an ordinary libel suit . It was taken up<br />
and espoused by one political party, and condemned by the other . Public meetdngs<br />
numbering over two thosand per-sons were<br />
held previous to the trial, endorsing 'the<br />
action of the defendant .<br />
In Nevf'ound'Iend we have had more 'then one ce lebrated t rial of 8 historica l<br />
character J i n both divisions of the Supreme Court, and anyone can sp end a plea sant