25.12.2013 Views

the lion of the russian army - Florida State University

the lion of the russian army - Florida State University

the lion of the russian army - Florida State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Isaev to take Archimandrite Filipovic to Serbia, who had earlier provided him with<br />

information on <strong>the</strong> Austro-Serbian negotiations. 45 At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> Serbian political<br />

factions continued intense feud with each o<strong>the</strong>r. Bagration later learned, through<br />

Filipovic, <strong>the</strong> Serbian factions manipulated him to <strong>the</strong>ir advantage. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Serbian<br />

leaders, Milenko Stojkovic, intercepted Karadjordje’s letters describing <strong>the</strong> actual<br />

situation in Serbia, while <strong>the</strong> Serbian delegations provided Bagration with <strong>the</strong> selective<br />

information and contributed to his alienation from Karadjordje. 46<br />

In his letter to <strong>State</strong> Chancellor Rumyantsev, Prince Peter analyzed <strong>the</strong> Serbian<br />

affairs. He argued that <strong>the</strong> Serbian appeal to place Serbia under Russian administration<br />

was not in <strong>the</strong> Russian interests and would detrimental to peace negotiations with <strong>the</strong><br />

Porte. Prince Peter was also against establishing a special commission to investigate<br />

situation in Serbia. He argued that Russia should not be involved in <strong>the</strong> Serbian internal<br />

affairs but “to retain as much influence among <strong>the</strong> [Serbs] as required under given<br />

political circumstances.” Bagration also opposed <strong>the</strong> change <strong>of</strong> Serbian leadership.<br />

Although he had tense relations with Karadjordje, Prince Peter respected him. He wrote,<br />

“I find it extremely harmful not only for our interests but to Serbia as well to make any<br />

changes in its supreme leadership. On one hand, Karadjordje has seven years <strong>of</strong><br />

experience in leading <strong>the</strong> nation; he greatly contributed to <strong>the</strong> liberation <strong>of</strong> his people<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Turkish yoke and acquired considerable experience in <strong>the</strong> process. However, he<br />

is described as a very harsh man, somewhat credulous and ignorant [nesvedushii]. On<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> election <strong>of</strong> new leader would cause only new feuds and intrigues between<br />

<strong>the</strong> faction leaders and could be exploited by [anti-Russian] elements to harm us.” 47<br />

44 Bagration to Isaev, 29 November 1809; Bagration to Alexander, 4 December 1809,<br />

Correspondence <strong>of</strong> Bagration, 94-98.<br />

45 VPR, V, 343-45, 369; Arsenijevic-Batalaka, Istorija Prvog Srpskog Ustanka, 626, 736-37;<br />

Djordjevic, Politiçka istorija Srbije, 273-74; Petrov, Russo-Turkish War <strong>of</strong> 1806-1812, II, 299-<br />

305, 309-11.<br />

46 Arsenijevic-Batalaka, Istorija Prvog Srpskog Ustanka, 626-27, 788; Djordjevic, Politiçka<br />

istorija Srbije, 274; Voennii sbornik, 2 (1865): 237-39.<br />

47 Bagration to Rumyantsev, 25 December 1809, VPR, V, 325-26.<br />

574

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!