the lion of the russian army - Florida State University

cooperated in preparing the Russian armies for the campaign. Yet, their relationship
deteriorated starting late in June. As already discussed, Bagration was not informed of
the details of the strategic plan Alexander adopted. This led to him question Barclay’s
decisions. One of the important factors in this process laid in difference of personalities.
Count de Segur gives an excellent description of these generals:
On the one side we have the cool courage and the informed methodical and
tenacious intelligence of Barclay: he had a German mind, as well as German
blood and he wished to reduce everything, even risks, to the process of
calculations. On other hand we encounter the warlike, bold and violent
instincts of Bagration, an out and out Russian of the school of Suvorov….
Bagration was ferocious in combat, but he read in no other books save the
one of nature. 22
General Alexander Yermolov, chief of staff of the 1 st Western Army also left
interesting portrays of these remarkable men.
Prolonged subordinate service concealed Barclay de Tolly in obscurity,
made him accustomed to gradual promotion, constricted his hopes and
ambition…. Prince Bagration, on the contrary, rapidly became famous….
The Italian Campaign [of 1799] promoted him; Suvorov’s genius showered
him with fame, gathered homage that attracted great attention; encouraged
abilities inspired his self-confidence….
Being quickly promoted to the rank of general, then appointed Minister of
War and soon after commander-in-chief of the 1 st Western Army, Barclay
de Tolly was envied by many…. Awkward at the court, he did not earn
respect and good will of the people close to the Tsar. Being unexcited, he
was liked neither by his colleagues, nor by subordinates. At the same time,
Bagration was also appointed to same high positions (except for the post of
the Minister of War) but his success was based on expectations and
estimations. Certainly he caused envy, but he did not gain enemies. Of
smart and cunning wit, he made powerful connections at the Court…
He was responsible and pleasant in relations, and kept his old
acquaintances. Surrounded by the fame, he shared his accomplishments
with others and fairly described assistance he received. He generously
rewarded subordinates, who were delighted to serve and idolized him.
22 Ségur, Philippe Paul, comte de, Histoire de Napoléon et de la grande-armée pendant
l'année 1812, (Paris, 1825) I, 264.
727