15.01.2014 Views

TELE-TECH & - AmericanRadioHistory.Com

TELE-TECH & - AmericanRadioHistory.Com

TELE-TECH & - AmericanRadioHistory.Com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

o.<br />

-.4111111..._<br />

'1.2<br />

i<br />

OE BELOW FREE SPACE RELD<br />

+20<br />

AIRPLANE AT<br />

I<br />

W<br />

+10<br />

-10<br />

11 `1``<br />

Fq<br />

'%<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

10,000'<br />

AT 20-<br />

ANTENNA<br />

ANTENNA AT 26,6'<br />

FREQ UENCY 394 MC,-<br />

a<br />

-<br />

V4<br />

"4T..<br />

- _<br />

-MAM<br />

=400 MCrS<br />

'<br />

' v/^`<br />

1=2% MC/5 ' i'<br />

-<br />

l -_<br />

f=230 MC9S 1.5'<br />

2.0'<br />

.0<br />

o -0 30 40 50 -<br />

DISTANCES IN MILES<br />

60 90 BO 90 00<br />

2^^_<br />

3 . 30 60 90 120 150 IBO 210 240 290 300 330 361<br />

DEGREES<br />

Fig. 5: Signal strength at 20 ft. and 26.6 ft. antennas<br />

Fig. 6: System instrument error<br />

Direction Finders<br />

(continued)<br />

the instantaneous direction of the<br />

two fields are the same). Adjustable<br />

magnetic damping is applied<br />

to the phase meter shaft to reduce<br />

needle swing due to noise and rapid<br />

changes in bearing.<br />

Fig. 7: Simplified<br />

block diagram of<br />

remote station<br />

SON. -, . ONNrrRaDlxr<br />

I Sou ,r..ND "°.<br />

OC<br />

CD,<br />

n<br />

MACS<br />

yss<br />

e<br />

.: _ Rñ a,.a<br />

!ACTON<br />

V<br />

REMOTE<br />

COQ *ROL<br />

V<br />

AZIMUTH<br />

INDICATOR<br />

i<br />

Diversity Techniques<br />

An analysis of propagation phenomena<br />

in the 225 to 400 MC<br />

frequency range reveals a continual<br />

variation between a minimum and<br />

a maximum in the r -f field at the<br />

D/F antenna as the transmitting<br />

aircraft's vertical angular position<br />

varies with respect to the D/F<br />

antenna. This condition results<br />

from the fact that energy radiated<br />

from the airborne transmitter<br />

reaches the ground antenna by two<br />

different paths, a direct path and<br />

an indirect path that involves reflection<br />

from the ground as shown<br />

in Fig. 2.<br />

COMPARATOR<br />

SIMPLIFIED BLOC% DIAGRAM<br />

Depending upon path difference<br />

and corresponding phase relationships<br />

of the direct and reflected<br />

rays, the resultant effect may be<br />

either additive or subtractive. In<br />

the latter case, the field strength<br />

at the receiving antenna is considerably<br />

reduced and may drop<br />

essentially to zero if the two interfering<br />

rays are nearly equal in<br />

strength and exactly out of phase.<br />

When a null occurs, it may be impossible<br />

to obtain a bearing due to<br />

insufficient signal level. Moreover,<br />

under conditions where a reflected<br />

signal from nearby buildings or<br />

TUATA<br />

9 T. MOOT<br />

Fig. 8: <strong>Com</strong>parator<br />

automatically connects<br />

antenna receiving<br />

stronger<br />

signal to indicator<br />

ckts<br />

other masses overrides the resultant<br />

of the direct and ground<br />

reflected wave, an erroneous bearing<br />

may be obtained. However,<br />

space and height diversity techniques<br />

can be successfully used to<br />

minimize these effects.<br />

The succession of maxima and<br />

minima produces a definite interference<br />

pattern for an antenna at<br />

a particular height. A second<br />

antenna mounted at a different<br />

height will not have the same interference<br />

pattern because the distance<br />

traveled by the ground<br />

reflected wave is different. This<br />

means that nulls do not occur at the<br />

same instant for the two antennas.<br />

It then becomes possible to choose<br />

an optimum height difference so<br />

that the minima of one antenna<br />

will almost always be filled by the<br />

maxima of the other. Fig. 4 illustrates<br />

signal reception with two<br />

D/F antennas at different heights.<br />

Although interference minima<br />

could be eliminated by intercepting<br />

the rays reflected from the ground<br />

before they reach the D/F antenna,<br />

for example, by surrounding the<br />

antenna with suit -screens, consideration<br />

of the geometry involved indi-<br />

(Continued on page 193)<br />

92 Tele -Tech & ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES June 1956

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!