19.01.2014 Views

annual report annual report annual report annual report 2005

annual report annual report annual report annual report 2005

annual report annual report annual report annual report 2005

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32<br />

RADIATION CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, RADIATION TECHNOLOGIES<br />

[5]. Qin X.-Z., Trifunac A.D.: J. Phys. Chem., 94, 4751<br />

(1990).<br />

[6]. Danilczuk M., Sadlo J., Lund A., Hamada H., Michalik<br />

J.: Nukleonika, 50, Suppl.2, S51 (<strong>2005</strong>).<br />

[7]. Shiotani M., Yuasa F., Sohma J.: J. Phys. Chem., 75,<br />

2669 (1975).<br />

[8]. Danilczuk M., Pogocki D., Lund A., Michalik J.:<br />

PCCP, 6, 1165 (2004).<br />

[9]. O’Malley P.J., Collins S.J.: Chem. Phys. Lett., 259,<br />

296 (1996).<br />

[10]. O’Malley P.J.: Chem. Phys. Lett., 262, 797 (1996).<br />

[11]. O’Malley P.J.: J. Phys. Chem. A, 101, 6334 (1997).<br />

[12]. O’Malley P.J.: J. Phys Chem. A, 101, 9813 (1997).<br />

[13]. O’Malley P.J.: J. Phys Chem. A, 102, 248 (1998).<br />

[14]. Barone V.: Structure, magnetic properties and reactivities<br />

of open-shell species from density functional<br />

and self-consistent hybrid methods. In: Recent advances<br />

in density functional methods. Part I. Ed. D.P.<br />

Chong. World Scientific Publ. Co., Singapore 1996.<br />

[15]. Becke A.D.: J. Chem. Phys., 98, 5648 (1993).<br />

[16]. Frisch M.J. et al.: Gaussian 98. (Rev.A.7). Gaussian<br />

Inc., Pittsburgh 1998.<br />

[17]. Yanagita Y., Amaro A.A., Seff K.: J. Phys. Chem.,<br />

77, 805 (1973).<br />

[18]. Pluth J.J., Smith J.V.: J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102, 4704<br />

(1980).<br />

[19]. Ya-Jun Liu, Lund A., Persson P., Lunell S.: J. Phys.<br />

Chem. B, 109, 7948 (<strong>2005</strong>).<br />

EFFECT OF HINDERED AMINE LIGHT STABILIZERS<br />

ON RADIATION RESISTANCE OF POLYPROPYLENE<br />

MEASURED BY DSC<br />

Andrzej Rafalski, Grażyna Przybytniak<br />

In many polymers, hindered amine light stabilizers<br />

(HALSs) are used as radical scavengers and antioxidants<br />

to protect material against photodegradation<br />

[1]. It is generally accepted that the decomposition<br />

of polyolefines initiated by ionizing radiation<br />

proceeds comparably to UV-induced degradation,<br />

i.e. via free radical mechanism [2,3], thus<br />

the application of amine stabilizer as a protecting<br />

agent against radio-degradation is fully entitled.<br />

Oxidative damage is the main reason for applying<br />

antioxidants as the radioprotective agents in polypropylene<br />

(PP). HALSs are well known radical<br />

scavengers that inhibit the propagation of free radicals<br />

acting as their scavengers.<br />

Two various phases occur in isotactic polypropylene<br />

(iPP) – ordered domains of the crystalline<br />

phase and variety of amorphous sites [2]. Thus,<br />

there are two types of peroxyl radicals formed during<br />

irradiaton and situated in the totally different<br />

vicinity. Random orientation of macromolecules<br />

in the amorphous phase facilitates peroxyl radical<br />

mobility and involves their faster decay. Therefore,<br />

the amount of the radicals considerably decreases<br />

in presence of stabilizers. Defined rigid structure<br />

of crystal delays the combination of radicals and<br />

the unpaired electron is transferred into other sites<br />

inducing postirradiation damages for months. Assuming<br />

homogeneous distribution of modifiers added<br />

to polypropylene in melted state, we found unambiguously<br />

that radicals are scavenged by HALSs<br />

predominantly in amorphous phase as in presence<br />

of hindered amines a significant decrease in characteristic<br />

electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)<br />

signal of peroxyl radical just in this phase was observed<br />

[4].<br />

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) method<br />

was applied to characterize physical properties of<br />

isotactic polypropylene modified by selected<br />

HALSs before and after irradiation. Three types<br />

of amine stabilizers were applied: two derivatives<br />

of 1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl piperidine of low and high<br />

molecular weight (Tinuvin 765 and Tinuvin 622,<br />

respectively) and one polymeric derivative of<br />

2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine (Chimassorb 944).<br />

In order to increase the compatibility of HALS –<br />

polymer macromolecules, maleic anhydride (MA)<br />

was added to the composites. Physical alternations<br />

were estimated comparing changes in phase transitions<br />

and crystallization temperatures before and<br />

after electron beam exposure.<br />

Isotactic polypropylene (Malen P J601) was<br />

mixed with the following additives: Tinuvin 622<br />

(T622), Tinuvin 675 (T675) and Chimassorb 944<br />

(C944). Selected samples were mixed with maleic<br />

anhydride. Samples were prepared in a Brabender<br />

mixer at 180 o C and subsequently compressed between<br />

two metal plates quenching with water. Concentration<br />

of additives is expressed as the parts per<br />

hundred resin (phr). Irradiation with a 10 MeV electron<br />

beam was performed using a linear accelerator<br />

LAE 13/9 in air at ambient temperature. All<br />

samples were irradiated to a dose of 25 kGy.<br />

Thermal analysis was carried out using a TA<br />

Instruments differential scanning calorimeter<br />

(MDSC 2920). The measurements were performed<br />

under nitrogen at a heating rate of 10 o C/min. About<br />

5 mg samples were placed in aluminum pans and<br />

inserted in the cell. During the first cycle, the cell<br />

was heated from the ambient temperature to<br />

200 o C, then kept for 5 min at this temperature and<br />

gradually cooled. The second run was performed<br />

afterwards applying the same conditions as for the<br />

first cycle.<br />

Phase transitions of polypropylene are influenced<br />

by electron beam irradiation. The melting<br />

behavior of polypropylene shown in Fig.1A indicates<br />

that the melting peak obtained during the<br />

first cycle at 163 o C, in the second cycle becomes<br />

wider due to increase of low temperature endotherm.<br />

For irradiated polypropylene, a single peak<br />

detected during first heating splits in the second<br />

cycle and two distinct minima are observed. High<br />

temperature melting peak is less intensive, whereas<br />

the intensity of low temperature peak significantly<br />

increases indicating that ionizing radiation induces<br />

changes in morphology of the polymeric material.<br />

Multiple-peak endotherms reveal separation of<br />

different crystals that occurs during slow recrys-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!