19.01.2014 Views

annual report annual report annual report annual report 2005

annual report annual report annual report annual report 2005

annual report annual report annual report annual report 2005

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102<br />

many found the ratio to be higher than unity (e.g.<br />

[3,4]). Our results indicate that this ratio may also<br />

be donor-specific, although in none of the cases<br />

Fig. Ratios of total 2B-type to total 2A-type exchanges.<br />

Exchanges observed after all doses of radiation (approximate<br />

range – 0.2-2.8 Gy) were summed up.<br />

were the deviations from unity strong enough to<br />

be statistically significant. The mean ratio for all<br />

chromosomes and donors was found to be close<br />

to 1.<br />

The results presented in this and the preceding<br />

<strong>report</strong> indicate that inter-donor differences do<br />

exist, however, not with respect to all chromosomes.<br />

Our observations very well agree with the data published<br />

by others in that chromosome 2 is less radiosensitive<br />

than expected with minimal inter-donor<br />

RADIOBIOLOGY<br />

variability. Chromosome 14 is more sensitive than<br />

expected and the sensitivity of chromosome 8 corresponds<br />

to its DNA content, however, this trend<br />

is individually variable. It appears that inter-donor<br />

variability is an important factor in the radiosensitivity<br />

of individual chromosomes and may<br />

explain some of the controversies regarding the<br />

inter-chromosomal distribution of radiation-induced<br />

aberrations. The implication of this conclusion<br />

for biological dosimetry is that the inter-donor<br />

variability is a potential source of error in<br />

calculating the dose absorbed by one individual on<br />

the basis of a calibration curve generated with lymphocytes<br />

of a different individual. This error can<br />

be minimized by choosing chromosome 2 for analysis.<br />

The work was supported by the Polish Ministry<br />

of Scientific Research and Information Technology<br />

– project No. 6 P05A 119 20.<br />

References<br />

[1]. Lloyd D.C., Lucas J.N., Edwards A.A., Deng W.,<br />

Valente E., Hone P.A., Moquet J.E.: Radiat. Res., 155,<br />

809-817 (2001).<br />

[2]. Tucker J.D., Ramsey M.J., Lee D.A., Minkler J.L.:<br />

Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 64, 27-37 (1993).<br />

[3]. Schmid E., Zitzelsberger H., Braselmann H., Gray<br />

J.W., Bauchinger M.: Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 62, 673-678<br />

(1992).<br />

[4]. Natarajan A.T., Vyas R.C., Darroudi F., Vermeulen<br />

S.: Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 61, 199-203 (1992).<br />

THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON THE FREQUENCY<br />

OF RADIATION-INDUCED MICRONUCLEI<br />

IN HUMAN PERIPHERAL BLOOD LYMPHOCYTES<br />

Kinga Brzozowska, Andrzej Wójcik<br />

The impact of temperature on the frequency of<br />

radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in the<br />

human lymphocytes was first described by Bajerska<br />

and Liniecki [1]. We have performed experiments<br />

to analyze the impact of blood temperature at irradiation<br />

in vitro on the level of radiation-induced<br />

micronuclei. Blood samples were drawn from two<br />

healthy male donors aged 24 and 45 years and irradiated<br />

at 0, 20 and 37 o C with X-rays (200 kVp, 5<br />

mA, 3 mm Cu filter). The doses were: 0, 1 and 2<br />

Gy for the first donor, and 0, 1.35 and 2.7 Gy for<br />

the second donor. Twenty minutes before irradiation<br />

as well as during irradiation, the blood samples<br />

were incubated at 0, 20 or 37 o C. After irradiation,<br />

blood samples (0.5 ml) were transferred into 4.5<br />

ml RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 25%<br />

Fig. The dose-response curves for micronuclei (MN) in binucleated cells (BNC) in lymphocytes of the first (A) and<br />

second (B) donor. * – the difference significant with p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!