27.03.2014 Views

SEKE 2012 Proceedings - Knowledge Systems Institute

SEKE 2012 Proceedings - Knowledge Systems Institute

SEKE 2012 Proceedings - Knowledge Systems Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

classified. Recall is the probability that a (randomly selected)<br />

relevant data point is retrieved in a search. Precision and recall<br />

are calculated using the formulas in Eq. 2 and Eq. 3<br />

respectively.<br />

measure = 2 <br />

<br />

( )<br />

(1)<br />

fault events are expected. If a fault event is expected, then the<br />

remaining trained algorithms will determine in what zone,<br />

substation, and feeder the fault is expected to occur, and also if<br />

the fault will occur in an overhead or underground line. The<br />

modules presented in Fig. 5 form the basis for the DSS for<br />

forecasting fault events in the power distribution grid.<br />

=<br />

=<br />

# <br />

# <br />

# <br />

# <br />

(2)<br />

(3)<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

RPART f-measure<br />

NB f-measure<br />

KSVM f-measure<br />

NN f-measure<br />

Figure 4. Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models<br />

Based on the highest f-measure of the trained models for<br />

each analysis, the following selections were made to become<br />

the basis for the IOU Decision Support System:<br />

a) NN model was selected to predict faults based on<br />

weather;<br />

b) NN model was selected for prediction of the zone in<br />

the grid where a fault may occur;<br />

c) RPART model was selected to predict the substation<br />

where a fault may occur;<br />

d) NN model was selected to predict if the fault occurs in<br />

the overhead or underground lines;<br />

e) RPART model was selected to predict the feeder<br />

where a fault may occur in the grid.<br />

VI.<br />

The analytic models developed in thi s project and<br />

summarized in Section V formed the basis for the development<br />

of a decision support system (DSS) at IOU to forecast fault<br />

events in their power distribution grid. The analytic models<br />

have been trained using historical data which is pertinent to the<br />

IOU infrastructure and weather patterns in the r egions where<br />

their distribution grid is located. Fig. 5 depicts the modular<br />

view of the architecture of the fault event forecasting DSS, and<br />

the output types that are expected from the trained machine<br />

learning models. Given a certain weather forecast or forecasts,<br />

the Forecast Prediction NN model identifies if o ne or more<br />

FORECASTING FAULT EVENTS AT IOU<br />

Figure 5. Machine Learning Models as Basis for DSS<br />

VII. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK<br />

This paper presented a machine learning approach to<br />

forecast fault events in a p ower distribution grid. The<br />

investigation developed and summarized in this paper was<br />

conducted as an applied research project utilizing real-life<br />

historical data from a power distribution utility (referred as<br />

IOU) in the US. The data from IOU dates as far back as 2008,<br />

and includes historical data on fault event occurrences, the<br />

electrical values from the grid at the time that the fault event<br />

occurred, as well as data associated with the topology of the<br />

grid (overhead and underground lines). Historical weather<br />

records collected from the US National Weather Service<br />

(NWS) and from the WeatherBug (WBUG) weather service<br />

during the time period when the fault events occurred were also<br />

included in the datasets employed to train the machine learning<br />

models. An additional historical dataset on lightning, also<br />

provided by WBUG, was included as part of the weather data.<br />

The fields used to fuse fault event data and weather data were<br />

the location and time stamp associated with the fault event. In<br />

situations when readings of weather are taken over certain<br />

intervals of time, a decision has to be made about what weather<br />

reading will be associated with a specific time stamp. In our<br />

study, the weather reading utilized was the one closest after the<br />

fault time stamp reading, since that weather reading covered<br />

the observation interval just ended which encompassed the<br />

fault time. However, an alternate approach would be to use a<br />

weather reading preceding the time stamp reading.<br />

462

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!