27.03.2014 Views

SEKE 2012 Proceedings - Knowledge Systems Institute

SEKE 2012 Proceedings - Knowledge Systems Institute

SEKE 2012 Proceedings - Knowledge Systems Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Improving a Web Usability Inspection Technique<br />

through an Observational Study<br />

Priscila Fernandes, Tayana Conte<br />

Grupo de Usabilidade e Engenharia de Software (USES)<br />

Universidade Federal do Amazonas<br />

Manaus, Brazil<br />

{priscila.fernandes, tayana}@icomp.ufam.edu.br<br />

Bruno Bonifácio<br />

Nokia <strong>Institute</strong> of Technology - INdT<br />

Manaus, Brazil<br />

{bruno.bonifacio}@indt.org.br<br />

Abstract— Given the growth in the usage of Web Applications,<br />

the usability of these applications has become a key success<br />

factor. Several technologies have been developed to evaluate and<br />

improve this quality factor. However, the usability inspections<br />

results still depend on the inspector’s experience. We have<br />

proposed a Web usability inspection approach, called WE-QT<br />

(Web Evaluation – Question Technique), a question based<br />

technique that aims to reduce the difficulties of inspectors with<br />

little knowledge of usability. We are following an<br />

experimentation-based methodology to support its development<br />

and improvement. This paper presents an observational study,<br />

aimed at eliciting how inspectors apply the WE-QT technique.<br />

We discuss the quantitative and qualitative results and their<br />

impact on improving the WE-QT. Results indicated that our<br />

technique assists novice inspectors uncovering usability problems<br />

effectively; despite qualitative data indicate the need for<br />

improvement.<br />

Keywords – web application, usability evaluation, inspection<br />

technique; observarional study; qualitative analysis<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

The increasing popularity of Web applications has allowed<br />

an intensive use of these applications in current society [1]. The<br />

success of Web applications can be determined by two<br />

features: their fast evolution and their usability [2]. Usability is<br />

considered to be one of the most important quality factors for<br />

Web applications, along with others such as reliability and<br />

security [3].<br />

The acceptability of Web applications relies strictly on the<br />

usability of the applications [4]. Web applications with poor<br />

usability will be quickly replaced by other ones more usable, as<br />

soon as its existence becomes known to the target audience [5].<br />

Still, users often face errors while using these applications,<br />

caused by the not intuitive interfaces [6]. Therefore, improving<br />

usability of Web application can substantially minimize the<br />

users’ interaction difficulty and improve the quality of these<br />

applications [7].<br />

The challenge of developing Web applications with more<br />

intuitive interface has made the usability evaluation of these<br />

applications an important research area. Several methodologies<br />

to ensure a good usability specific for Web applications have<br />

been proposed, some of them based on user testing and others<br />

based on inspections performed by experts [8]. However,<br />

usability evaluations on Web development processes are often<br />

avoided by developers or companies due to their lack of<br />

experience in the field. Despite the high demand for usability<br />

evaluations of Web applications, developing methods to assist<br />

novice inspectors detecting defects without compromising the<br />

inspection result is not a simple task. According to Conte et al.<br />

[9], inspectors’ skills such as experience on usability and<br />

inspection can affect the outcome of the inspection.<br />

For this reason, we have proposed a new usability<br />

inspection technique, called WE-QT (Web Evaluation<br />

Question-Technique) [10]. The WE-QT technique was<br />

specifically tailored for usability evaluation of Web<br />

applications for novice evaluators. It uses a question based<br />

approach to guide the inspectors uncovering usability<br />

problems. The main goal of our solution is to minimize the<br />

difficulties and efforts of software developers with little<br />

knowledge in usability when executing inspections.<br />

To support the development and validation of the WE-QT<br />

technique, we adopted the experimental methodology presented<br />

in [11]. This methodology comprises four stages: 1) feasibility<br />

studies to determine the usage possibility of the technology; 2)<br />

observational studies to improve the understanding of the<br />

technology, that aims to answer the question “Do the steps of<br />

the process make sense?”; 3) case studies in real lifecycle to<br />

characterize the technology application during a real lifecycle,<br />

and; 4) case studies in industry to identify if technology<br />

application fits into the industrial setting. Following this<br />

methodology, Fernandes et al. [10] presented an overview of<br />

the development of our technique and the feasibility study<br />

results, including discussions on how the methodology guided<br />

this phase of its development.<br />

This paper describes the conducted observational study,<br />

aimed at eliciting how inspectors apply the WE-QT technique.<br />

We analyzed the qualitative data using coding procedures [12].<br />

We discuss the results of the quantitative and qualitative data<br />

analyses and their impact in the improvement of the WE-QT<br />

technique. The results show that our technique assists novice<br />

inspector detecting usability defects effectively.<br />

The remainder of this paper is structured as follows:<br />

Section 2 presents some background information on Web<br />

usability evaluation. Section 3 pr esents our technique, as th e<br />

results of a feasibility study aimed at improving the technique.<br />

In Section 4, the observational study to evaluate our technique<br />

588

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!