19.04.2014 Views

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proposition 3 In the short run, protectionist policies reduce the real remuneration of<br />

l<strong>and</strong>owners, capitalists in the primary sector <strong>and</strong> service workers. If φ<br />

a<br />

> 0, protectionist policies<br />

will raise the real remuneration of workers <strong>and</strong> capitalists in the secondary sector.<br />

Medium run<br />

In the medium run, labor is allowed to move across industries, so wages equalize across sectors.<br />

Log-linearizing the market clearing condition for labor, we have:<br />

( m + y ) + (1 − λ)<br />

( n + y ) l<br />

λ<br />

m m<br />

n n<br />

=<br />

This equation <strong>and</strong> the condition that lm = ln<br />

= l replace the two equations of wage determination<br />

obtained for the case of the short-run equilibrium. Now, the short-run effects of an improvement in<br />

the terms of trade include an increase in the production of services <strong>and</strong> a decrease in the total<br />

production of manufactures. Since there is no factor adjustment in the primary sector, the<br />

remuneration of capital <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> increase by the same proportion as the terms of trade. This<br />

generates an upward shift in the dem<strong>and</strong> for services which is met both by an increase in its<br />

equilibrium price <strong>and</strong> by a displacement of labor from the secondary to the tertiary sector. The<br />

manufacturing sector uses less labor, <strong>and</strong> the return to capital in this sector therefore falls. Overall,<br />

consumption of the primary good decreases, <strong>and</strong> consumption of the manufactured <strong>and</strong> service<br />

goods increases.<br />

Proposition 4 In the medium run, an improvement in the terms of trade increases the real<br />

remuneration received by l<strong>and</strong>owners <strong>and</strong> capitalists in the primary sector. It harms capitalists in<br />

the manufacturing sector. The real wage increases if <strong>and</strong> only if:<br />

χ (1 − λ)<br />

><br />

a<br />

( φ β + α )<br />

Higher dem<strong>and</strong> for services increases wages in that sector <strong>and</strong> attracts workers from the<br />

manufacturing sector, raising wages across the economy. However, the equilibrium increase in<br />

wages may fall short of compensating the negative welfare effect of the increase in the price of the<br />

agricultural good. The more specialized in the primary <strong>and</strong> tertiary sector the economy is (i.e., a<br />

higher χ<br />

a<br />

<strong>and</strong> a lower λ ), the more likely it is that real wages will increase in the medium run.<br />

This is because, in such cases, the upward shift in dem<strong>and</strong> for labor in the service sector is<br />

stronger. Thus, notice that, if the economy is already industrialized, an increase in the terms of<br />

trade may harm workers even in the medium run.<br />

Proposition 5 In the medium run, protectionist policies reduce the real remuneration of<br />

l<strong>and</strong>owners <strong>and</strong> capitalists in the primary sector. If φ<br />

a<br />

> 0, protectionist policies increase the real<br />

remuneration of capitalists in the manufacturing sector. If φ<br />

a<br />

> 0, workers' welfare increases if<br />

<strong>and</strong> only if:<br />

m<br />

φ<br />

a<br />

a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!