19.04.2014 Views

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 2. Basic Statistics<br />

Food<br />

Clothing<br />

Housing<br />

60%<br />

12%<br />

25%<br />

50%<br />

10%<br />

20%<br />

Percentage of Total Exp.<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

Percentage of Total Exp.<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

Percentage of Total Exp.<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

10%<br />

2%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

0%<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

0%<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Quintil Expenditures<br />

Quintil Expenditures<br />

Quintil Expenditures<br />

EGH 1985/86 ENGH 1996/97 ENGH 2004/05<br />

EGH 1985/86 ENGH 1996/97 ENGH 2004/05<br />

EGH 1985/86 ENGH 1996/97 ENGH 2004/05<br />

Household Equipment & Manteinance<br />

Health<br />

Transport & Comunications<br />

10%<br />

12%<br />

18%<br />

9%<br />

16%<br />

8%<br />

10%<br />

14%<br />

Percentage of Total Exp.<br />

7%<br />

6%<br />

5%<br />

4%<br />

3%<br />

Percentage of Total Exp.<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

Percentage of Total Exp.<br />

12%<br />

10%<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

4%<br />

1%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

0%<br />

0%<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Quintil Expenditures<br />

Quintil Expenditures<br />

Quintil Expenditures<br />

EGH 1985/86 ENGH 1996/97 ENGH 2004/05<br />

EGH 1985/86 ENGH 1996/97 ENGH 2004/05<br />

EGH 1985/86 ENGH 1996/97 ENGH 2004/05<br />

Recreation<br />

Education<br />

Other good & services<br />

12%<br />

6%<br />

7%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

6%<br />

Percentage of Total Exp.<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

Percentage of Total Exp.<br />

4%<br />

3%<br />

2%<br />

Percentage of Total Exp.<br />

5%<br />

4%<br />

3%<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

1%<br />

1%<br />

0%<br />

0%<br />

0%<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Quintil Expenditures<br />

Quintil Expenditures<br />

Quintil Expenditures<br />

EGH 1985/86 ENGH 1996/97 ENGH 2004/05<br />

EGH 1985/86 ENGH 1996/97 ENGH 2004/05<br />

EGH 1985/86 ENGH 1996/97 ENGH 2004/05<br />

To check the consistency <strong>and</strong> quality of the data, Table 1a shows the main demographic<br />

characteristics for each survey. The table shows that the data is fairly homogenous but<br />

that over the period of the three surveys <strong>Argentina</strong> has experienced a reduction in<br />

household size, a larger share of females in the labor force, <strong>and</strong> an increase in the<br />

number of single parents’ households.<br />

Table 1a. Demographics<br />

EGH 85 / 86 ENGH 96 / 97 ENGH 04 / 05<br />

Mean S. D. Minimun Maximun Mean S. D. Minimun Maximun Mean S. D. Minimun Maximun<br />

Share of food 0.45 0.17 0.01 1.00 0.40 0.17 0.01 1.00 0.31 0.14 0.00 0.95<br />

Relative price of food <strong>and</strong> non-food 1.09 0.20 0.52 1.69 1.06 0.03 0.95 1.17 1.17 0.06 0.99 1.39<br />

Household expenditure 1,601.0 1,334.7 100.9 13,929.3 1,011.6 947.5 2.2 12,792.5 1,375.9 1,196.9 52.1 15,337.8<br />

Household income 1,657.6 1,447.4 0.0 23,933.0 1,202.4 1,118.6 0.0 14,980.3 1,490.2 1,521.9 0.0 29,779.5<br />

Household size 3.58 1.70 1 13 3.46 1.96 1 17 2.61 1.46 1 12<br />

Percentage of pop. in Capital Federal 35% 48% 0% 100% 30% 46% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100%<br />

% of members ages 0 to 4 0.08 0.14 0% 67% 6% 12% 0% 67% 4% 11% 0% 67%<br />

% of members ages 5 to 9 0.08 0.14 0% 67% 6% 12% 0% 67% 4% 11% 0% 67%<br />

% of members ages 10 to 15 0.07 0.13 0% 75% 6% 12% 0% 75% 4% 10% 0% 75%<br />

% of members ages 15 to 19 0.06 0.13 0% 75% 7% 14% 0% 100% 4% 12% 0% 100%<br />

Male head 83% 38% 0% 100% 74% 44% 0% 100% 64% 48% 0% 100%<br />

Spouse present 78% 42% 0% 100% 68% 47% 0% 100% 55% 50% 0% 100%<br />

Head has a job 75% 43% 0% 100% 65% 48% 0% 100% 72% 45% 0% 100%<br />

Spouse has a job 24% 43% 0% 100% 24% 43% 0% 100% 30% 46% 0% 100%<br />

Head <strong>and</strong> spouse have both a job 22% 41% 0% 100% 19% 39% 0% 100% 28% 45% 0% 100%<br />

Owner occupied 75% 43% 0% 100% 71% 45% 0% 100% 61% 49% 0% 100%<br />

Free housing occupied 11% 31% 0% 100% 15% 36% 0% 100% 11% 31% 0% 100%<br />

Observations<br />

2,703<br />

4,867<br />

2,814<br />

Weigthed sample 2,885,720<br />

3,224,364<br />

1,127,851<br />

To compare the nominal variables we use the CPI to bring them to a comparable basis<br />

(in the table all prices are expressed in 1999 pesos). The table shows that, according to<br />

the data, income levels decrease quite sizably between the 85/86 wave <strong>and</strong> the 96/97<br />

sample. Notice that during the same period (see Figure 2) there is an unambiguous

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!