19.04.2014 Views

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

⎡<br />

φ ⎤<br />

a<br />

+ φm<br />

(1−<br />

λ ) ⎢( 1−<br />

β ) χa<br />

+ β<br />

⎥ ≤1<br />

⎣<br />

φa<br />

+ ( 1−τ<br />

) φm<br />

⎦<br />

Workers' welfare increases with protectionism if the economy is beyond a given level of<br />

industrialization. In this case, workers may ally with capitalists in the secondary sector to dem<strong>and</strong><br />

protectionist policies. If τ = 0 , this condition is satisfied as soon as the economy starts producing<br />

in the secondary sector. A higher tax rate implies that the condition will be met for higher λ <strong>and</strong><br />

lower χ<br />

a<br />

. In Figure 3, we find the pairs ( π , τ ) , such that workers are indifferent to whether there<br />

is more or less protection, since movement in either direction will improve workers' welfare in the<br />

medium run.<br />

Moreover, we expect that, the more industrialized the economy is, the larger the share of workers<br />

who will be employed in the secondary sector <strong>and</strong>, hence, by virtue of Proposition 2, the larger the<br />

share of workers who will also benefit from protectionist policies in the short run.<br />

Long Run<br />

In the long run, the economy will tend toward a new steady state. Therefore, it is useful to analyze<br />

the effects of protectionism based on the results obtained in Section 7.1.<br />

A full analysis of the long-run solution for this economy is fairly complicated. Nevertheless, the<br />

two propositions set out below suffice for our purposes in this paper. We focus only on the<br />

preferences for protectionism of l<strong>and</strong>lords <strong>and</strong> workers, since we assume that capitalists are<br />

concerned only with policies in the short <strong>and</strong> medium run, when their capital is sunk in one<br />

particular activity. We assume that the economy is initially in the specialization <strong>and</strong> trade or in the<br />

diversification <strong>and</strong> trade regions (i.e., it exports the primary good). Otherwise, changes in the<br />

export tax rate would not have any effect.<br />

Proposition 6 In the long run, l<strong>and</strong>lords benefit from an improvement in the terms of trade<br />

<strong>and</strong> from a reduction in export taxes.<br />

Proposition 7 If the economy is specialized, then, in the long run, workers benefit from<br />

∗<br />

an improvement in the terms of trade <strong>and</strong> from a reduction in export taxes. There is always a π<br />

high enough so that workers are better off at τ = 0 .<br />

7.3 Constant-Elasticity-of-Substitution (CES) Preferences <strong>and</strong> Technology in<br />

Autarky<br />

In this appendix, we derive a log-linearization around the autarky equilibrium for a CES economy.<br />

The results of this section are referred to in Section 3.4.<br />

The production functions of the agricultural <strong>and</strong> manufactured goods are, respectively:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!