19.04.2014 Views

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

Exceptional Argentina Di Tella, Glaeser and Llach - Thomas Piketty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER ONE<br />

Newly Rich, Not Modern Yet: <strong>Argentina</strong> Before the Depression<br />

Lucas <strong>Llach</strong><br />

Universidad Torcuato <strong>Di</strong> <strong>Tella</strong><br />

Abstract. I address in this paper several exceptionalities of <strong>Argentina</strong>'s pre-Depression<br />

experience. First: its level of development, as captured by dimensions other than GDP per<br />

capita, was not as high as its rank in per capita income, consistently #11 or better, held during<br />

1905-1930. Second, its record growth in 1870-1914 was, to some extent, a one-shot affair: the<br />

appearance of a new transport technology (railways) allowed for the incorporation of<br />

agricultural l<strong>and</strong>s previously unused or dedicated to low productivity ranching. In terms of<br />

factor accumulation, the increase in the l<strong>and</strong>-labor ratio accounted for most of <strong>Argentina</strong>'s<br />

convergence. The experience of the 1920s suggests that a change towards a more capital<br />

intensive economic structure was beginning to take place. Yet, <strong>Argentina</strong>'s pre-Depression<br />

peculiarities posed some questions for its future development. Given the limits on natural<br />

resources <strong>and</strong> its dilution through massive migration, subsequent growth depended on<br />

physical <strong>and</strong> human capital accumulation, two dimensions in which <strong>Argentina</strong> departed<br />

somewhat from the rich countries of the day.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

<strong>Argentina</strong> is, arguably, the only country to have entered <strong>and</strong> ab<strong>and</strong>oned the First World in the<br />

modern era. If, for example, admittance to the club of the rich is granted when GDP per capita<br />

trails by less than 20% the top countries’ income, <strong>Argentina</strong> belonged to the club between<br />

1903 <strong>and</strong> 1930. During that period, the ratio between <strong>Argentina</strong>’s per capita GDP <strong>and</strong> the<br />

average income of the three big industrialized European (Engl<strong>and</strong>, France <strong>and</strong> Germany) <strong>and</strong><br />

the two early success stories outside Europe (Australia <strong>and</strong> the U.S.) was steadily over 80%,<br />

except during a couple of years in World War I. The ratio reached as much as 90% right<br />

before the Great War <strong>and</strong> was still hovering around 83% on the verge of the Depression 1 . By<br />

the end of the twentieth century, the ratio to that same group had fallen to 39%. In terms of<br />

ranking, taking into account the 53 countries in the Maddison database with pre-Depression<br />

GDP levels, <strong>Argentina</strong> fluctuated between positions #7 <strong>and</strong> #11 every year between 1903 <strong>and</strong><br />

1929 except for 1916 <strong>and</strong> 1917 (Appendix, Table A. 1 <strong>and</strong> Figure A. 1). Leaving periods of<br />

world wars aside, none of the countries that made it to the top ten at some point in the 20th<br />

century subsequently fell below the median rank (#27), as <strong>Argentina</strong> did in 1989-90 (#29).<br />

1 Data from Maddison (2006).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!