22.04.2014 Views

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Legal Scholarship and the Roles <strong>of</strong> the Jurist<br />

At first sight these pronouncements by three prominent judges<br />

suggest that legal scholarship is moving in different directions in<br />

England and the United States. Lord G<strong>of</strong>f praises <strong>English</strong> legal<br />

scholars for their recent contributions to legal development and<br />

practice and promises them an enhanced status. Posner and<br />

Edwards, on the other hand, accuse American law schools <strong>of</strong> abandoning<br />

their role. <strong>The</strong>re are significant differences, but the underlying<br />

similarities may be more significant: first, in both countries legal<br />

scholarship has diversified. G<strong>of</strong>f focuses almost exclusively on the<br />

contributions <strong>of</strong> traditional expositors and, in this context, barely<br />

mentions other kinds <strong>of</strong> work. Posner and Edwards on the other<br />

hand were reacting to the diversification <strong>of</strong> legal scholarship. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

may be right about a decline in prestige <strong>of</strong> traditional doctrinal<br />

scholarship, but it is quite misleading to suggest that it has been<br />

abandoned. 67 Secondly, all three judges either assume or assert that<br />

exposition is the core <strong>of</strong> legal scholarship and that the main role<br />

<strong>of</strong> jurists is to serve the legal system—especially the higher courts—<br />

by assisting in the rationalisation, simplification and interstitial<br />

development <strong>of</strong> legal doctrine. Thirdly, all agree that this role is<br />

important, but it is essentially subordinate. In the common law<br />

system power and authority is divided beteen the legislature, the<br />

executive and the judiciary in complex ways. Jurists are useful, but<br />

they have no <strong>of</strong>ficial constitutional position. 68 In the common law<br />

system the role <strong>of</strong> the expositor is honourable, but strictly subordinate—more<br />

like poodles under the bench than lions supporting the<br />

throne.<br />

REACTIONS AGAINST EXPOSITION AND THE<br />

SEARCH FOR ALTERNATIVES<br />

Academic polemics require recognisable opponents. From the<br />

mid-1960s law teachers who were dissatisfied with the state <strong>of</strong> academic<br />

law began to construct a target to attack—they called it by<br />

various names: "black letter law", 69 "the expository orthodoxy", 70<br />

"the textbook tradition", 71 and, later, "classical legal thought" 72 .<br />

<strong>The</strong> central charge was that <strong>English</strong> academic law had been dominated<br />

by a monolithic orthodoxy which was narrow, conservative,<br />

illiberal, unrealistic and boring.<br />

As I was one <strong>of</strong> those who helped to create this story, I should<br />

take some responsibility for it, without re-fighting old battles. In<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!