22.04.2014 Views

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Legal Scholarship and the Roles <strong>of</strong> the Jurist<br />

1960s, William Twining, <strong>The</strong> Place <strong>of</strong> Customary <strong>Law</strong> in the National Legal Systems<br />

<strong>of</strong> East Africa (1964), Chap. 2.<br />

45 <strong>The</strong> American <strong>Law</strong> Institute Annual Report (1990); Simmons, op. cit., quotes significantly<br />

higher figures.<br />

46 Lewis, op. cit, n. 38.<br />

47 Cairns, op. cit. at p. 24.<br />

48 David Sugarman, "Legal <strong>The</strong>ory, the Common <strong>Law</strong> Mind and the Making <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Textbook Tradition" LTCL Chap. 3, at p. 29.<br />

49 ibid, at pp. 28-29, citing Dicey and Pollock.<br />

50 Pollock tended to be more overtly critical than most expositors <strong>of</strong> that generation.<br />

On Dicey, see below, n. 53.<br />

51 See above n. 34.<br />

52 ibid, at p. 31.<br />

53 A.W.B. Simpson, "<strong>The</strong> Rise and Fall <strong>of</strong> the Legal Treatise" (1981) 48 University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Chicago L. Rev. 632, reprinted in Legal <strong>The</strong>ory and History: Essays on the<br />

Common <strong>Law</strong> (1987) Chap. 12 at p. 307. Simpson adds: "Dicey's Conflict <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Law</strong>s (1896), continuously revised by later editors, is perhaps the best known <strong>of</strong><br />

the works that have perpetuated this format to the present day." ibid. Dicey's<br />

<strong>Law</strong> and the Constitution (1st ed., 1885) really belongs to a different genre and,<br />

perhaps for that reason, is better known outside legal circles than most orthodox<br />

textbooks.<br />

54 P. Birks, "<strong>The</strong> Historical Context" in Birks (ed) Reviewing Legal Education<br />

(forthcoming).<br />

55 On the sad fate <strong>of</strong> Charles F. Chamberlayne's five volume treatise on evidence<br />

that did not conform to these conventions see RE at pp. 61-65.<br />

56 T.B. Smith, "Authors and Authority," (1972) 12 J.S.P.T.L. (N.S.) 1 (Presidential<br />

Address). <strong>English</strong> law continues to be largely impervious to systematisation and<br />

theorising on the grand scale. This applies as much to legislation as to judgemade<br />

law, see Lord G<strong>of</strong>f, discussed below.<br />

57 Robert G<strong>of</strong>f, "<strong>The</strong> Search for Principle", Maccabean Lecture (1983) LXIX Procs.<br />

British Academy 169; "judge, Jurist and Legislator", Child and Co., Oxford Lecture<br />

(1986), reprinted in (1987) Denning <strong>Law</strong> Jo. 79.<br />

58 ibid at p. 92. Robert G<strong>of</strong>f is a former law teacher, co-author <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

highly regarded modern treatises—G<strong>of</strong>f and Jones on Restitution—and a<br />

respected Lord <strong>of</strong> Appeal in Ordinary. His gracious recognition <strong>of</strong> the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> doctrinal scholarship in the <strong>English</strong> legal system and <strong>of</strong> the complementary<br />

roles <strong>of</strong> judges and jurists has since been echoed by some <strong>of</strong> his brethren on the<br />

bench, e.g. Lord Woolf, Protection <strong>of</strong> the Public: A New Challenge (1990)<br />

(Hamlyn Lectures 41), Chap. 1. Not surprisingly it has been welcomed by the<br />

objects <strong>of</strong> his praise. His statements have been interpreted as almost the first<br />

sincere and open acknowledgment that legal scholars have a significant practical<br />

contribution to make to our legal system.<br />

59 R. Posner, "<strong>The</strong> Decline <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> as an Autonomous Discipline: 1962-1987", 100<br />

Harvard L. Rev. 761. "Autonomy" is used here in a weak sense to refer to law<br />

as "a subject properly entrusted to persons trained in law and in nothing else."<br />

(at p. 762). Posner elaborated on the theme in "Conventionalism: <strong>The</strong> Key to<br />

<strong>Law</strong> as an Autonomous Discipline", (1988) 38 University <strong>of</strong> Toronto <strong>Law</strong> Jo.<br />

333.<br />

60 At p. 792.<br />

61 ibid at p. 777.<br />

62 <strong>The</strong>re has been a general, protracted controversy about "critical legal studies";<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!