22.04.2014 Views

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Epilogue<br />

isticated body <strong>of</strong> scholarship. <strong>The</strong>re is an admirable tradition in<br />

law schools, much influenced by America, <strong>of</strong> taking education<br />

seriously.<br />

However, our law schools are some way from realising their<br />

potential. It is not necessary for my argument to speculate how far<br />

<strong>English</strong> undergraduate degrees in law do provide a good general<br />

education for those who take them. My impression is that the practice<br />

is uneven, ranging from the excellent to the inadequate. <strong>The</strong><br />

cardinal sin <strong>of</strong> making an interesting subject boring is not<br />

unknown. <strong>The</strong> overloading <strong>of</strong> the undergraduate curriculum; the<br />

preference <strong>of</strong> some law firms for non-law graduates; the ambivalence<br />

<strong>of</strong> many academic lawyers about their roles and objectives<br />

are all matters <strong>of</strong> concern.<br />

If law schools are to flourish they need to move in the direction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ILC model. <strong>The</strong> case for embracing this model can be<br />

restated as follows:<br />

It is in the social interest that our law schools should be involved<br />

in the systematic advancement and dissemination <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

about all aspects <strong>of</strong> law from a variety <strong>of</strong> perspectives and that they<br />

should be quite large and diverse rather than contracting into a<br />

small elite that focuses mainly on the upper reaches <strong>of</strong> the legal<br />

system.<br />

It is in the interests <strong>of</strong> law schools, law students and law teachers<br />

that they should broaden their range. Undergraduate options are<br />

increasingly being squeezed and vast tracts <strong>of</strong> law are conspicuously<br />

under-researched. Students have diverse needs and interests<br />

and should have the opportunity to choose from a reasonably<br />

broad menu <strong>of</strong> subjects, perspectives and methods. Academic lawyers<br />

need varied outlets in order to flourish.<br />

It may be less easy to persuade the legal pr<strong>of</strong>ession that law<br />

schools should diversify in this way, because this could be interpreted<br />

as law schools distancing themselves from the pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

and weakening its influence. But the ILC multi-functional model is<br />

as much in the interests <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ession as <strong>of</strong> anyone.<br />

At the lowest level it will relieve the so-called problem <strong>of</strong> "oversupply"<br />

<strong>of</strong> law graduates: if the pr<strong>of</strong>ession really helped to promulgate<br />

the idea that a law degree is and should be genuinely liberal<br />

and academic in the best sense, this would maintain a broad pool<br />

<strong>of</strong> talent from which to select, take pressure <strong>of</strong>f undergraduates to<br />

make premature career choices, and it would help to reduce the<br />

expectation that a law degree is an automatic passport to practice.<br />

In respect <strong>of</strong> undergraduate degrees, if only a third to a half <strong>of</strong> law<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!