Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...
Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...
Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Epilogue<br />
isticated body <strong>of</strong> scholarship. <strong>The</strong>re is an admirable tradition in<br />
law schools, much influenced by America, <strong>of</strong> taking education<br />
seriously.<br />
However, our law schools are some way from realising their<br />
potential. It is not necessary for my argument to speculate how far<br />
<strong>English</strong> undergraduate degrees in law do provide a good general<br />
education for those who take them. My impression is that the practice<br />
is uneven, ranging from the excellent to the inadequate. <strong>The</strong><br />
cardinal sin <strong>of</strong> making an interesting subject boring is not<br />
unknown. <strong>The</strong> overloading <strong>of</strong> the undergraduate curriculum; the<br />
preference <strong>of</strong> some law firms for non-law graduates; the ambivalence<br />
<strong>of</strong> many academic lawyers about their roles and objectives<br />
are all matters <strong>of</strong> concern.<br />
If law schools are to flourish they need to move in the direction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the ILC model. <strong>The</strong> case for embracing this model can be<br />
restated as follows:<br />
It is in the social interest that our law schools should be involved<br />
in the systematic advancement and dissemination <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />
about all aspects <strong>of</strong> law from a variety <strong>of</strong> perspectives and that they<br />
should be quite large and diverse rather than contracting into a<br />
small elite that focuses mainly on the upper reaches <strong>of</strong> the legal<br />
system.<br />
It is in the interests <strong>of</strong> law schools, law students and law teachers<br />
that they should broaden their range. Undergraduate options are<br />
increasingly being squeezed and vast tracts <strong>of</strong> law are conspicuously<br />
under-researched. Students have diverse needs and interests<br />
and should have the opportunity to choose from a reasonably<br />
broad menu <strong>of</strong> subjects, perspectives and methods. Academic lawyers<br />
need varied outlets in order to flourish.<br />
It may be less easy to persuade the legal pr<strong>of</strong>ession that law<br />
schools should diversify in this way, because this could be interpreted<br />
as law schools distancing themselves from the pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
and weakening its influence. But the ILC multi-functional model is<br />
as much in the interests <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ession as <strong>of</strong> anyone.<br />
At the lowest level it will relieve the so-called problem <strong>of</strong> "oversupply"<br />
<strong>of</strong> law graduates: if the pr<strong>of</strong>ession really helped to promulgate<br />
the idea that a law degree is and should be genuinely liberal<br />
and academic in the best sense, this would maintain a broad pool<br />
<strong>of</strong> talent from which to select, take pressure <strong>of</strong>f undergraduates to<br />
make premature career choices, and it would help to reduce the<br />
expectation that a law degree is an automatic passport to practice.<br />
In respect <strong>of</strong> undergraduate degrees, if only a third to a half <strong>of</strong> law<br />
197