Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...
Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...
Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
What are <strong>Law</strong> <strong>School</strong>s for?<br />
(i) to move in the direction <strong>of</strong> being mainly service institutions for<br />
the pr<strong>of</strong>ession, curtailing undergraduate numbers, but becoming<br />
more involved in vocational training at all stages, including<br />
advanced and specialised training;<br />
(ii) to continue to be mainly primary schools, largely confined to<br />
introductory legal education, but to diversify their clientele by more<br />
wholeheartedly <strong>of</strong>fering "law for non-lawyers", especially by<br />
making undergraduate legal education more attractive as a form <strong>of</strong><br />
general or liberal education and competing for students with the<br />
social sciences and humanities; or<br />
(iii) to move more boldly in the direction <strong>of</strong> the ILC model by diversifying<br />
upwards as well as outwards, placing greater emphasis on<br />
advanced studies both for lawyers and non-lawyers and taking all<br />
law, not just lawyers' law, for their province.<br />
It should be fairly obvious that my sympathies lie with the more<br />
ambitious I.L.C. model and that I personally favour diversification<br />
<strong>of</strong> function and much greater emphasis on advanced and interdisciplinary<br />
studies. But my purpose here is to interpret the situation<br />
rather than to make a plea for a particular strategy. It is difficult<br />
to predict how the situation will develop during the next few<br />
years, except that it seems unlikely that the outcome will conform<br />
neatly to any single one <strong>of</strong> these models.<br />
Some things are reasonably clear, however: First, although the<br />
models are not mutually exclusive, there are pr<strong>of</strong>ound differences<br />
between a pr<strong>of</strong>essional school, an undergraduate liberal arts<br />
department, and a multi-functional institution concerned with the<br />
study <strong>of</strong> all aspects <strong>of</strong> law at a variety <strong>of</strong> levels. <strong>The</strong>se differences<br />
relate to objectives, scale, and finance and, above all, to what I<br />
shall refer to as academic culture. 27 Secondly, although government<br />
policy, the economy, and choices by individual institutions<br />
will play their part, the future shape <strong>of</strong> legal education is likely to<br />
continue to be largely demand-led, that is to say that to a very large<br />
extent developments will depend on the perceptions <strong>of</strong> parents,<br />
students and employers about the relevance <strong>of</strong> different kinds <strong>of</strong><br />
legal studies to their needs and aspirations. Thirdly, even if the<br />
institutionalised discipline <strong>of</strong> law expands outwards and upwards<br />
to encompass a more diverse clientele and a greater emphasis on<br />
advanced studies, primary legal education is likely for the foreseeable<br />
future to be at the core <strong>of</strong> the funding <strong>of</strong> university law schools<br />
as institutions. If a law degree is perceived as being mainly the<br />
first stage towards qualifying as a barrister or solicitor and if the<br />
opportunities to qualify and to earn a good living in legal practice<br />
57