22.04.2014 Views

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7. <strong>The</strong> Quest For a Core<br />

"but there ain't-a-going to be no core" (Mark Twain) 1<br />

Sociologists <strong>of</strong> knowledge tell us that some disciplines are convergent<br />

tightly-knit communities "in terms <strong>of</strong> their fundamental<br />

ideologies, their common values, their shared judgements <strong>of</strong> quality,<br />

their awareness <strong>of</strong> belonging to a unique tradition . . . {and} are<br />

likely to occupy territories with well-defined external boundaries." 2<br />

Others are centrifugal.<br />

At some points in the history <strong>of</strong> the Anglo-American tradition,<br />

law as an academic discipline could have been described as cohesive<br />

and centripetal: the object <strong>of</strong> study was legal rules and the role<br />

<strong>of</strong> the jurist was to systematise, to rationalise, and to expound legal<br />

doctrine. However, at no stage was this view unchallenged. As we<br />

have seen, from the late nineteenth century in the United States,<br />

much later in England, the predominant view came under regular<br />

and increasingly open attack from critics who seemed to have little<br />

in common except a shared sense <strong>of</strong> dissatisfaction with the prevailing<br />

orthodoxy.<br />

It should not be surprising to find in an expanding discipline: (i)<br />

few who accept the idea <strong>of</strong> an autonomous discipline in a strong<br />

sense; (ii) increasing pluralism, including differentiation <strong>of</strong> specialisms<br />

and multiplicity <strong>of</strong> perspectives; and, per contra, (iii) scholars<br />

agonising and debating about the nature <strong>of</strong> their enterprise: is it in<br />

any way unique or distinctive? What are its parameters? Does it<br />

have a centre or core or essence?<br />

In the current intellectual climate, it is tempting to dismiss questions<br />

about the core or essence <strong>of</strong> a discipline as misguided or<br />

plain silly, to be treated no more seriously than the quest for a<br />

non-existent Holy Grail or where the rainbow ends. Why assume<br />

that <strong>Law</strong>—or History or Sociology—has or should have a settled<br />

core? I am inclined to share such scepticism, but the theme is sufficiently<br />

persistent and there is enough at stake to make it worth<br />

looking at some salient examples <strong>of</strong> attempts to define the core in<br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!