Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...
Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...
Blackstone's Tower: The English Law School - College of Social ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7. <strong>The</strong> Quest For a Core<br />
"but there ain't-a-going to be no core" (Mark Twain) 1<br />
Sociologists <strong>of</strong> knowledge tell us that some disciplines are convergent<br />
tightly-knit communities "in terms <strong>of</strong> their fundamental<br />
ideologies, their common values, their shared judgements <strong>of</strong> quality,<br />
their awareness <strong>of</strong> belonging to a unique tradition . . . {and} are<br />
likely to occupy territories with well-defined external boundaries." 2<br />
Others are centrifugal.<br />
At some points in the history <strong>of</strong> the Anglo-American tradition,<br />
law as an academic discipline could have been described as cohesive<br />
and centripetal: the object <strong>of</strong> study was legal rules and the role<br />
<strong>of</strong> the jurist was to systematise, to rationalise, and to expound legal<br />
doctrine. However, at no stage was this view unchallenged. As we<br />
have seen, from the late nineteenth century in the United States,<br />
much later in England, the predominant view came under regular<br />
and increasingly open attack from critics who seemed to have little<br />
in common except a shared sense <strong>of</strong> dissatisfaction with the prevailing<br />
orthodoxy.<br />
It should not be surprising to find in an expanding discipline: (i)<br />
few who accept the idea <strong>of</strong> an autonomous discipline in a strong<br />
sense; (ii) increasing pluralism, including differentiation <strong>of</strong> specialisms<br />
and multiplicity <strong>of</strong> perspectives; and, per contra, (iii) scholars<br />
agonising and debating about the nature <strong>of</strong> their enterprise: is it in<br />
any way unique or distinctive? What are its parameters? Does it<br />
have a centre or core or essence?<br />
In the current intellectual climate, it is tempting to dismiss questions<br />
about the core or essence <strong>of</strong> a discipline as misguided or<br />
plain silly, to be treated no more seriously than the quest for a<br />
non-existent Holy Grail or where the rainbow ends. Why assume<br />
that <strong>Law</strong>—or History or Sociology—has or should have a settled<br />
core? I am inclined to share such scepticism, but the theme is sufficiently<br />
persistent and there is enough at stake to make it worth<br />
looking at some salient examples <strong>of</strong> attempts to define the core in<br />
153