02.05.2014 Views

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102 Chapter 3. Electron and positron interactions<br />

(i) Sample κ from the PDF (3.118), as κ = κ c /[1 − ξ(1 − κ c )].<br />

(ii) Generate a new random number ξ.<br />

(iii) If ξ < κ 2 P (+)<br />

k (κ), deliver κ.<br />

(iv) Go to step (i).<br />

The efficiency of this algorithm, for given values of the kinetic energy and the cutoff<br />

reduced energy loss κ c , practically coincides with that of the algorithm for electron<br />

collisions described above (see table 3.1).<br />

Secondary electron emission<br />

According to our GOS model, each oscillator W k corresponds to a shell with f k electrons<br />

and ionization energy U k . After a hard collision with an inner-shell electron, the<br />

primary electron/positron has kinetic energy E − W , the “secondary” electron (delta<br />

ray) is ejected with kinetic energy E s = W −U i , and the residual ion is left in an excited<br />

state, with a vacancy in shell i, which corresponds to an excitation energy equal to<br />

U i . This energy is eventually released by emission of energetic x rays and Auger electrons.<br />

However, in penelope the relaxation of ions produced in hard collisions is not<br />

followed. The production of vacancies in inner shells and their relaxation is simulated<br />

by an independent, more accurate, scheme (see section 3.2.6) that is free from the crude<br />

approximations involved in our GOS model. To avoid double counting, the excitation<br />

energy U i of the residual ion is deposited locally. On the other hand, when the impact<br />

ionization occurs in an outer shell or in the conduction band, the initial energy of the<br />

secondary electron is set equal to W and no fluorescent radiation from the ionized atom<br />

is followed by the simulation program. This is equivalent to assuming that the secondary<br />

electron carries away the excitation energy of the target atom.<br />

To set the initial direction of the delta ray, we assume that the target electron was<br />

initially at rest, i.e. the delta ray is emitted in the direction of the momentum transfer<br />

q. This implies that the polar emission angle θ s (see fig. 3.1) coincides with the recoil<br />

angle θ r [which is given by eq. (A.42)],<br />

cos 2 θ s =<br />

W 2 /β 2 (<br />

1 + Q(Q + 2m ec 2 ) − W 2 ) 2<br />

. (3.119)<br />

Q(Q + 2m e c 2 ) 2W (E + m e c 2 )<br />

In the case of close collisions (Q = W ), this expression simplifies to<br />

cos θ s (Q = W ) =<br />

( W<br />

E<br />

E + 2m e c 2<br />

W + 2m e c 2 ) 1/2<br />

, (3.120)<br />

which agrees with the result for binary collisions with free electrons at rest, see eq.<br />

(A.18). Since the momentum transfer lies on the scattering plane (i.e. on the plane<br />

formed by the initial and final momenta of the projectile), the azimuthal emission angle<br />

is φ s = π + φ.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!