02.05.2014 Views

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2. Inelastic collisions 85<br />

plays a central role in the Bethe stopping power formula [eq. (3.103) below]. This<br />

quantity has been determined empirically for a large number of materials (see Berger<br />

and Seltzer, 1982, and references therein) from measurements of the stopping power of<br />

heavy charged particles and/or from experimental optical dielectric functions. In the<br />

following, we shall assume that the mean excitation energy of the stopping medium is<br />

known.<br />

3.2.1 GOS model<br />

The simulation of inelastic collisions of electrons and positrons in penelope is performed<br />

on the basis of the following GOS model, which is tailored to allow fast random<br />

sampling of W and Q. We assume that the GOS splits into contributions from the different<br />

atomic electron shells. Each atomic shell k is characterized by the number Z k of<br />

electrons in the shell and the ionization energy U k . To model the contribution of a shell<br />

to the GOS, we refer to the example of the hydrogen atom (fig. 3.7) and observe that for<br />

Q > U k the GOS reduces to the Bethe ridge, whereas for Q < U k it is nearly constant<br />

with Q and decreases rapidly with W ; a large fraction of the OOS concentrates in a<br />

relatively narrow W -interval. Consideration of other well-known systems, such as inner<br />

shells of heavy atoms (Manson, 1972) and the free-electron gas (Lindhard and Winther,<br />

1964), shows that these gross features of the GOS are universal. Liljequist (1983) proposed<br />

modelling the GOS of each atomic electron shell as a single “δ-oscillator”, which<br />

is an entity with a simple GOS given by (see fig. 3.8)<br />

F (W k ; Q, W ) = δ(W − W k )Θ(W k − Q) + δ(W − Q)Θ(Q − W k ), (3.47)<br />

where δ(x) is the Dirac delta function and Θ(x) is the step function. The first term<br />

represents resonant low-Q (distant) interactions, which are described as a single resonance<br />

at the energy W k . The second term corresponds to large-Q (close) interactions,<br />

in which the target electrons react as if they were free and at rest (W = Q). Notice<br />

that the oscillator GOS satisfies the sum rule<br />

∫ ∞<br />

F (W k ; Q, W ) dW = 1 for any Q (3.48)<br />

0<br />

and, consequently, a δ-oscillator corresponds to one electron in the target. The Liljequist<br />

GOS model for the whole atom is given by<br />

df(Q, W )<br />

dW<br />

= ∑ k<br />

f k [δ(W − W k )Θ(W k − Q) + δ(W − Q)Θ(Q − W k )] . (3.49)<br />

where the summation in k extends over all bound electron shells (and the conduction<br />

band, in the case of conductors) and the partial oscillator strength f k is identified with<br />

the number of electrons in the k-th shell, i.e. f k = Z k . The corresponding OOS reduces<br />

to<br />

df(W )<br />

dW<br />

= ∑ f k δ(W − W k ), (3.50)<br />

k

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!