PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ρ<br />
ρ<br />
ρ<br />
λ<br />
λ<br />
λ<br />
ρ<br />
ρ<br />
ρ<br />
λ<br />
λ<br />
λ<br />
3.1. Elastic collisions 75<br />
paths. When E increases, the DCS becomes strongly peaked in the forward direction<br />
and 〈µ 2 〉 becomes much smaller than 〈µ〉. In the high-energy limit, σ el,2 ≃ 3σ el,1 (λ el,2 ≃<br />
λ el,1 /3). The total cross section, ∝ 1/(ρλ el ), decreases monotonously with E to reach a<br />
constant value at high energies. This saturation is a relativistic effect: the total cross<br />
section measures the interaction probability, which is proportional to the time spent<br />
by the projectile within the region where the scattering field is appreciable. This time<br />
is determined by the speed of the projectile, which approaches c from below when the<br />
projectile energy increases. In the non-relativistic theory, the speed v n.r. = (2E/m e ) 1/2<br />
increases without limit with E and the calculated non-relativistic total cross section<br />
tends to zero at high energies.<br />
1Ε+7<br />
1Ε+7<br />
1Ε+6<br />
Al<br />
el, 1<br />
1Ε+6<br />
Au<br />
ρλ el<br />
, ρλ el,1<br />
, ρλ el,2<br />
(µg /cm 2 )<br />
1Ε+5<br />
1Ε+4<br />
1Ε+3<br />
1Ε+2<br />
1Ε+1<br />
el, 2<br />
el<br />
ρλ el<br />
, ρλ el,1<br />
, ρλ el,2<br />
(µg /cm 2 )<br />
1Ε+5<br />
1Ε+4<br />
1Ε+3<br />
1Ε+2<br />
1Ε+1<br />
el, 1<br />
el, 2<br />
el<br />
1Ε+0<br />
1Ε+0<br />
1Ε− 1<br />
1Ε− 1<br />
1Ε+2 1Ε+3 1Ε+4 1Ε+5 1Ε+6 1Ε+7<br />
1Ε+2 1Ε+3 1Ε+4 1Ε+5 1Ε+6 1Ε+7<br />
E (eV)<br />
E (eV)<br />
Figure 3.3: Elastic mean free path, λ el , and first and second transport mean free paths, λ el,1<br />
and λ el,2 , for electrons scattered in aluminium and gold as functions of the kinetic energy of<br />
the projectile.<br />
3.1.1 The modified Wentzel (MW) model<br />
Although it is possible to do Monte Carlo simulation of electron and positron transport<br />
using numerical partial-wave DCSs (Benedito et al., 2001), this procedure is too<br />
laborious to be adopted as the basis of a simulation code for general purposes (mostly<br />
because of the large volume of required numerical information). It is more convenient to<br />
use suitable analytical approximate DCSs that may differ in detail from the partial-wave