02.05.2014 Views

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

130 Chapter 4. Electron/positron transport mechanics<br />

of generating the angular deflection in artificial soft events. When the result given by<br />

eq. (4.27) is applicable, the single parameter λ (s)<br />

el,1 completely determines the multiple<br />

scattering distribution due to soft collisions, i.e. other details of the DCS for scattering<br />

angles less than θ c are irrelevant. However, in actual Monte Carlo simulations, the<br />

small-angle approximation is seldom applicable.<br />

In most practical cases the number of hard collisions per electron track can be made<br />

relatively large by simply using a small value of the parameter C 1 [see eq. (4.10)]. When<br />

the number of steps is large enough, say larger than ∼ 10, it is not necessary to use the<br />

exact distribution F (s) (s; χ) to sample the angular deflection in artificial soft collisions.<br />

Instead, we may use a simpler distribution, F a (s; χ), with the same mean and variance,<br />

without appreciably distorting the simulation results. This is so because the details of<br />

the adopted distribution are washed out after a sufficiently large number of steps and<br />

will not be seen in the simulated distributions. Notice that, within the small angle<br />

approximation, it is necessary to keep only the proper value of the first moment to<br />

get the correct final distributions. However, if the cutoff angle θ c is not small enough,<br />

the angular distribution F (s) (s; χ) may become sensitive to higher-order moments of<br />

the soft single scattering distribution. Thus, by also keeping the proper value of the<br />

variance, the range of validity of the simulation algorithm is extended, i.e. we can speed<br />

up the simulation by using larger values of C 1 (or of λ (h)<br />

el ) and still obtain the correct<br />

distributions.<br />

We now return to the notation of section 3.1, and use the variable µ ≡ (1 − cos χ)/2<br />

to describe angular deflections in soft scattering events. The exact first and second<br />

moments of the multiple scattering distribution F (s) (s; µ) are<br />

〈µ〉 (s) ≡<br />

∫ 1<br />

0<br />

µF a (s; µ) dµ = 1 2<br />

[<br />

1 − exp(−s/λ<br />

(s)<br />

el,1) ] (4.28)<br />

and<br />

∫ 1<br />

〈µ 2 〉 (s) ≡ µ 2 F a (s; µ) dµ = 〈µ〉 (s) − 1 [<br />

(s)<br />

1 − exp(−s/λ el,2<br />

0<br />

6<br />

)] . (4.29)<br />

The angular deflection in soft scattering events will be generated from a distribution<br />

F a (s; µ), which is required to satisfy eqs. (4.28) and (4.29), but is otherwise arbitrary.<br />

penelope uses the following,<br />

F a (s; µ) = aU 0,b (µ) + (1 − a)U b,1 (µ), (4.30)<br />

where U u,v (x) denotes the normalized uniform distribution in the interval (u, v),<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨ 1/(v − u) if u ≤ x ≤ v,<br />

U u,v (x) =<br />

⎪⎩ 0 otherwise.<br />

(4.31)<br />

The parameters a and b, obtained from the conditions (4.28) and (4.29), are<br />

b = 2〈µ〉(s) − 3〈µ 2 〉 (s)<br />

1 − 2〈µ〉 (s) , a = 1 − 2〈µ〉 (s) + b. (4.32)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!