PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
114 Chapter 3. Electron and positron interactions<br />
Thus, the angular distribution in K reads<br />
p(cos θ) = p d (cos θ ′ ) d(cos θ′ )<br />
d(cos θ)<br />
⎡<br />
= A 3 8<br />
⎣1 +<br />
+ (1 − A) 3 4<br />
( ) ⎤ 2<br />
cos θ − β<br />
⎦<br />
1 − β cos θ<br />
⎡<br />
⎣1 −<br />
( ) ⎤ 2<br />
cos θ − β<br />
⎦<br />
1 − β cos θ<br />
1 − β 2<br />
(1 − β cos θ) 2<br />
1 − β 2<br />
(1 − β cos θ) 2 . (3.150)<br />
Now, it is clear that when β tends to unity, the shape function concentrates at forward<br />
directions.<br />
We found that the benchmark partial-wave shape functions of Kissel et al. (1983)<br />
can be closely approximated by the analytical form (3.150) if one considers A and β as<br />
adjustable parameters. Explicitly, we write<br />
p fit (cos θ) = A 3 8<br />
⎡<br />
⎣1 +<br />
+ (1 − A) 3 4<br />
( cos θ − β<br />
′<br />
⎡<br />
1 − β ′ cos θ<br />
⎣1 −<br />
) 2<br />
⎤<br />
⎦<br />
(<br />
cos θ − β<br />
′<br />
1 − β ′ cos θ<br />
1 − β ′2<br />
(1 − β ′ cos θ) 2<br />
) 2<br />
⎤<br />
⎦<br />
1 − β ′2<br />
(1 − β ′ cos θ) 2 , (3.151)<br />
with β ′ = β(1 + B). The parameters A and B have been determined, by least squares<br />
fitting, for the 144 combinations of atomic number, electron energy and reduced photon<br />
energy corresponding to the benchmark shape functions tabulated by Kissel et al.<br />
(1983). Results of this fit are compared with the original partial-wave shape functions<br />
in fig. 3.16. The largest differences between the fits and the data were found for the<br />
higher atomic numbers, but even then the fits are very accurate, as shown in fig. 3.16.<br />
The quantities ln(AZβ) and Bβ vary smoothly with Z, β and κ and can be obtained<br />
by cubic spline interpolation of their values for the benchmark cases. This permits the<br />
fast evaluation of the shape function for any combination of Z, β and κ. Moreover, the<br />
random sampling of the photon direction, i.e. of cos θ, can be performed by means of a<br />
simple, fast analytical algorithm (see below). For electrons with kinetic energies larger<br />
than 500 keV, the shape function is approximated by the classical dipole distribution,<br />
i.e. by the analytical form (3.151) with A = 1 and β ′ = β.<br />
3.3.4 Simulation of hard radiative events<br />
Let us now consider the simulation of hard radiative events (W > W cr ) from the DCS<br />
defined by eqs. (3.146) and (3.151). penelope reads the scaled bremsstrahlung DCS<br />
from the database files and, by natural cubic spline interpolation/extrapolation in ln E,<br />
produces a table for a denser logarithmic grid of 200 energies (and for the “standard”<br />
mesh of 32 κ’s), which is stored in memory. This energy grid spans the full energy range