02.05.2014 Views

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 Chapter 2. Photon interactions<br />

penelope simulates the emission of characteristic radiation and Auger electrons that<br />

result from vacancies produced in K shells and L subshells by photoelectric absorption,<br />

Compton scattering and electron/positron impact (see chapter 3). The relaxation of<br />

these vacancies is followed until the K and L shells are filled up, i.e. until the vacancies<br />

have migrated to M and outer shells. Vacancies in these outer shells originate much less<br />

energetic secondary radiation, whose main effect is to spread out the excitation energy<br />

of the ion within the surrounding material. To get a reliable description of the dose<br />

distribution, and other macroscopic transport characteristics, we only have to follow<br />

secondary radiation that is able to propagate to distances of the order of, say, 1% of<br />

the penetration distance (or range) of the primary radiation. Radiation with lower<br />

energy does not need to be followed, since its only effect is to blur the “primary” dose<br />

distribution on a small length scale.<br />

To simplify the description of the ionization processes of outer shells (i.e. photoelectric<br />

absorption, Compton scattering and electron/positron impact), we simply assume<br />

that, when ionization occurs in M or outer shells, a secondary (delta) electron is emitted<br />

from the parent ion with a kinetic energy E s equal to the energy deposited by the<br />

primary particle,<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨ E − E ′ in Compton scattering,<br />

E dep = E in photoelectric absorption,<br />

⎪⎩ W in electron/positron impact (see chapter 3).<br />

(2.107)<br />

That is, the whole excitation energy of the ion is taken up by the ejected electron and<br />

no fluorescent radiation is simulated. In reality, the emitted electrons have energies less<br />

than the values (2.107) and can be followed by characteristic x rays, which have mean free<br />

paths that are usually much larger than the Bethe range of photoelectrons. By giving<br />

an artificially increased initial energy to the electron we allow it to transport energy<br />

farther from the ion so as to partially compensate for the neglect of other radiation<br />

emitted during the de-excitation cascade.<br />

In the case of ionization of an inner shell i, i.e. a K shell or an L shell, we consider<br />

that the electron is ejected with kinetic energy<br />

E s = E dep − U i , (2.108)<br />

where U i is the ionization energy of the active shell, and that the target atom is left with<br />

a vacancy in shell i. As mentioned above, we consider only characteristic x-rays and<br />

Auger electrons emitted in the first stages of the relaxation process. These secondary<br />

radiations are assumed to be emitted isotropically from the excited atom. We use the<br />

following notation to designate the possible transitions<br />

• Radiative: S0-S1 (an electron from the S1 shell fills the vacancy in the S0 shell, leaving<br />

a hole in the S1 shell). The considered radiative transitions (for elements with Z > 18<br />

with the M-shell filled) are shown in fig. 2.3.<br />

• Non-radiative: S0-S1-S2 (an electron from the S1 shell fills the vacancy in the S0 shell,<br />

and the released energy is taken away by an electron in the S2 shell; this process leaves

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!