02.05.2014 Views

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.3. Combined scattering and energy loss 139<br />

where the logarithmic derivatives have been introduced for numerical convenience. The<br />

factors in curly brackets account for the global effect of the energy dependence of the soft<br />

energy-loss DCS (within the linear approximation). To simulate soft energy losses, we<br />

sample ω from the artificial distribution G a (ω; s), eqs. (4.59) to (4.63), with the “correct”<br />

first moment and variance, given by expressions (4.78) and (4.79). In penelope, we<br />

use step lengths s such that the fractional energy loss along each step is relatively small<br />

(see below) and, consequently, the energy-dependence correction is also small (i.e. the<br />

correcting factors are close to unity).<br />

4.3 Combined scattering and energy loss<br />

Up to this point, soft scattering and energy loss have been regarded as essentially independent<br />

processes, while in reality they coexist. In this section, we consider their<br />

interplay and set the basis of an algorithm that simulates their combined effect.<br />

Ours is a mixed algorithm, where hard interactions are described individually from<br />

the associated DCSs (see chapter 3). These interactions are 1) hard elastic collisions,<br />

“el”, 2) hard inelastic collisions, “in”, 3) hard bremsstrahlung photon emission, “br”,<br />

4) ionization of inner shells, “si”, and, in the case of positrons, 5) positron annihilation,<br />

“an”. The mean free path between consecutive hard events, λ (h)<br />

T , is given by<br />

where σ (h)<br />

T<br />

[ ]<br />

(h) −1 (h)<br />

λ T = N σ T = N [ σ (h)<br />

el + σ (h)<br />

in + σ (h)<br />

br + σ si (+σ an ) ] ≡ Σ h , (4.80)<br />

is the total atomic cross section for hard interactions. We recall that the<br />

inverse mean free path, Σ h , gives the interaction probability per unit path length. In the<br />

absence of soft energy-loss events, the PDF of the step length s between two successive<br />

hard events (or from a given point in the track to the next hard event) is<br />

p(s) = Σ h exp (−Σ h s) . (4.81)<br />

In each hard event, one and only one interaction (i=“el”, “in”, “br”, “si” or “an”) occurs<br />

with probability<br />

p i = σ (h)<br />

i /σ (h)<br />

T . (4.82)<br />

When soft energy-losses are considered, the PDF of the distance s travelled by the<br />

particle to the following hard interaction is not given by eq. (4.81), because the mean<br />

free path λ (h)<br />

T varies with energy and may change appreciably along a single step. The<br />

simplest way to cope with this problem is to limit the length of the step to make sure<br />

that the average energy loss is much smaller than the kinetic energy E at the beginning<br />

of the step, and consider that λ (h)<br />

T (E) remains essentially constant along the step. Then,<br />

the mean energy loss in a step is given by<br />

〈∆E〉 = λ (h)<br />

T S(E), (4.83)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!