02.05.2014 Views

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

48 Chapter 2. Photon interactions<br />

the molecular Compton profile is obtained as the sum of atomic profiles of the atoms in<br />

a molecule (additivity rule).<br />

The factor F (p z ) in eq. (2.34) is approximately given by<br />

F (p z ) ≃ 1 + cq C<br />

E<br />

(<br />

1 + E C(E C − E cos θ)<br />

(cq C ) 2<br />

)<br />

pz<br />

m e c , (2.44)<br />

where q C is the momentum transfer associated with the energy E ′ = E C of the Compton<br />

line,<br />

q C ≡ 1 √<br />

E<br />

c<br />

2 + EC 2 − 2EE C cos θ. (2.45)<br />

Expression (2.44) is accurate only for small |p z |-values. For large |p z |, J i (p z ) tends to<br />

zero and the factor F (p z ) has no effect on the DCS. We use the values given by expression<br />

(2.44) only for |p z | < 0.2m e c and take F (±|p z |) = F (±0.2m e c) for |p z | > 0.2m e c. Owing<br />

to the approximations introduced, negative values of F may be obtained for large |p z |;<br />

in this case, we must set F = 0.<br />

We can now introduce the effect of electron binding: Compton excitations are allowed<br />

only if the target electron is promoted to a free state, i.e. if the energy transfer E − E ′<br />

is larger than the ionization energy U i of the active shell. Therefore the atomic DCS,<br />

including Doppler broadening and binding effects, is given by<br />

d 2 σ Co<br />

dE ′ dΩ = r2 e<br />

2<br />

( ) 2 ( EC EC<br />

E<br />

E + E )<br />

− sin 2 θ<br />

E C<br />

× F (p z )<br />

( ∑<br />

i<br />

)<br />

f i J i (p z ) Θ(E − E ′ dpz<br />

− U i )<br />

dE ′, (2.46)<br />

where Θ(x) (= 1 if x > 0, = 0 otherwise) is the Heaviside step function. In the<br />

calculations we use the ionization energies U i given by Lederer and Shirley (1978), fig.<br />

2.4. The DCS for scattering of 10 keV photons by aluminium atoms is displayed in fig.<br />

2.7, for θ = 60 and 180 degrees, as a function of the fractional energy of the emerging<br />

photon. The DCS for a given scattering angle has a maximum at E ′ = E C ; its shape<br />

resembles that of the atomic Compton profile, except for the occurrence of edges at<br />

E ′ = E − U i .<br />

In the case of scattering by free electrons at rest we have U i = 0 (no binding) and<br />

J i (p z ) = δ(p z ) (no Doppler broadening). Moreover, from eq. (2.37) E ′ = E C , so that<br />

photons scattered through an angle θ have energy E C . Integration of the DCS, eq.<br />

(2.46), over E ′ then yields the familiar Klein-Nishina cross section,<br />

dσ KN<br />

Co<br />

dΩ<br />

= Z r2 e<br />

2<br />

( EC<br />

E<br />

) 2 ( EC<br />

E + E )<br />

− sin 2 θ , (2.47)<br />

E C<br />

for the Z atomic electrons [cf. eq. (2.33)]. For energies of the order of a few MeV and<br />

larger, Doppler broadening and binding effects are relatively small and the free-electron<br />

theory yields results practically equivalent to those of the impulse approximation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!