PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
PENELOPE 2003 - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
48 Chapter 2. Photon interactions<br />
the molecular Compton profile is obtained as the sum of atomic profiles of the atoms in<br />
a molecule (additivity rule).<br />
The factor F (p z ) in eq. (2.34) is approximately given by<br />
F (p z ) ≃ 1 + cq C<br />
E<br />
(<br />
1 + E C(E C − E cos θ)<br />
(cq C ) 2<br />
)<br />
pz<br />
m e c , (2.44)<br />
where q C is the momentum transfer associated with the energy E ′ = E C of the Compton<br />
line,<br />
q C ≡ 1 √<br />
E<br />
c<br />
2 + EC 2 − 2EE C cos θ. (2.45)<br />
Expression (2.44) is accurate only for small |p z |-values. For large |p z |, J i (p z ) tends to<br />
zero and the factor F (p z ) has no effect on the DCS. We use the values given by expression<br />
(2.44) only for |p z | < 0.2m e c and take F (±|p z |) = F (±0.2m e c) for |p z | > 0.2m e c. Owing<br />
to the approximations introduced, negative values of F may be obtained for large |p z |;<br />
in this case, we must set F = 0.<br />
We can now introduce the effect of electron binding: Compton excitations are allowed<br />
only if the target electron is promoted to a free state, i.e. if the energy transfer E − E ′<br />
is larger than the ionization energy U i of the active shell. Therefore the atomic DCS,<br />
including Doppler broadening and binding effects, is given by<br />
d 2 σ Co<br />
dE ′ dΩ = r2 e<br />
2<br />
( ) 2 ( EC EC<br />
E<br />
E + E )<br />
− sin 2 θ<br />
E C<br />
× F (p z )<br />
( ∑<br />
i<br />
)<br />
f i J i (p z ) Θ(E − E ′ dpz<br />
− U i )<br />
dE ′, (2.46)<br />
where Θ(x) (= 1 if x > 0, = 0 otherwise) is the Heaviside step function. In the<br />
calculations we use the ionization energies U i given by Lederer and Shirley (1978), fig.<br />
2.4. The DCS for scattering of 10 keV photons by aluminium atoms is displayed in fig.<br />
2.7, for θ = 60 and 180 degrees, as a function of the fractional energy of the emerging<br />
photon. The DCS for a given scattering angle has a maximum at E ′ = E C ; its shape<br />
resembles that of the atomic Compton profile, except for the occurrence of edges at<br />
E ′ = E − U i .<br />
In the case of scattering by free electrons at rest we have U i = 0 (no binding) and<br />
J i (p z ) = δ(p z ) (no Doppler broadening). Moreover, from eq. (2.37) E ′ = E C , so that<br />
photons scattered through an angle θ have energy E C . Integration of the DCS, eq.<br />
(2.46), over E ′ then yields the familiar Klein-Nishina cross section,<br />
dσ KN<br />
Co<br />
dΩ<br />
= Z r2 e<br />
2<br />
( EC<br />
E<br />
) 2 ( EC<br />
E + E )<br />
− sin 2 θ , (2.47)<br />
E C<br />
for the Z atomic electrons [cf. eq. (2.33)]. For energies of the order of a few MeV and<br />
larger, Doppler broadening and binding effects are relatively small and the free-electron<br />
theory yields results practically equivalent to those of the impulse approximation.