05.05.2014 Views

WAR MEMOIRS OF DAVID LLOYD GEORGE 1917

WAR MEMOIRS OF DAVID LLOYD GEORGE 1917

WAR MEMOIRS OF DAVID LLOYD GEORGE 1917

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120 <strong>WAR</strong> <strong>MEMOIRS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>DAVID</strong> <strong>LLOYD</strong> <strong>GEORGE</strong><br />

planes with their fire before they reached London. Under<br />

the new organisation developed from General Smuts' recommendations,<br />

our air defences of London were rapidly transformed<br />

in strength and effectiveness. Daylight raids became<br />

too dangerous for the Germans to attempt, and night raids<br />

grew steadily more difficult and costly.<br />

The second matter referred to this Committee — the<br />

question of air organisation generally and the higher direction<br />

of aerial operations — took longer to examine. In consultation<br />

with me, General Smuts set himself to consider the<br />

questions:<br />

1. Shall there be instituted a real Air Ministry responsible<br />

for all air organisation and operations?<br />

2. Shall there be constituted a unified Air Service embracing<br />

both the present R.N.A.S. and R.F.C.?<br />

3. If so, how shall the relations of the new Air Service to the<br />

Navy and Army be determined so that the functions at present<br />

discharged for them by the R.N.A.S. and R.F.C. respectively shall<br />

continue to be efficiently performed by the new Air Service?<br />

The second and final report, presented by General Smuts<br />

on August 17th, <strong>1917</strong>, contained an examination of these<br />

questions and a series of recommendations for their solution.<br />

The report noted briefly the controversies which had<br />

raged round this issue in the former War Committee. It paid<br />

tribute to the excellent work of the reconstituted Air Board,<br />

but pointed out that this body was really a Conference rather<br />

than a Board, being a consultative association of representatives<br />

of the Fighting Services and Ministry of Munitions,<br />

without a technical and advisory personnel of its own. Hence<br />

it could never form an independent air policy, but only one<br />

subordinated to military and naval strategy. The time was<br />

now rapidly approaching when such subordination could no<br />

longer be justified.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!