05.05.2014 Views

WAR MEMOIRS OF DAVID LLOYD GEORGE 1917

WAR MEMOIRS OF DAVID LLOYD GEORGE 1917

WAR MEMOIRS OF DAVID LLOYD GEORGE 1917

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140 <strong>WAR</strong> <strong>MEMOIRS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>DAVID</strong> <strong>LLOYD</strong> <strong>GEORGE</strong><br />

Russians, it was suggested that there might be an advantage<br />

in sending a strong British delegation, even one headed by<br />

Mr. Arthur Henderson. Alternatively, it might be worth<br />

while to send Mr. Henderson to Petrograd on a special Mission,<br />

similar to that being carried out for the French by<br />

M. Albert Thomas. We were told that Mr. Ramsay Mac-<br />

Donald and Mr. Jowett of the Independent Labour Party,<br />

and Mr. Inkpin of the British Socialist Party, had now<br />

applied for passports to Petrograd, and presumably had the<br />

intention of stopping at Stockholm en route. This was a development<br />

arising from the invitation extended by the Russian<br />

Soviet to the Minority Socialist movements.<br />

It was not at this stage clear whether the various conversations<br />

proceeding at Stockholm were likely to be followed<br />

by a formal conference. If so, it was agreed that while<br />

there was a good case for having British representatives there<br />

to watch proceedings and put the British case, it would be<br />

very difficult for Mr. Henderson, as a member of the War<br />

Cabinet, to attend. If Mr. MacDonald and his pacifist friends<br />

were going, we felt that a strong delegation of the British<br />

Labour Party ought to go as well.<br />

We decided to cable Mr. Albert Thomas at Petrograd<br />

that we thought it dangerous for Russian and German Socialists<br />

to confer without any British representatives being<br />

present, and ask for his views on the matter.<br />

Two days afterwards, on May 23rd, we further considered<br />

the question of our representation in Russia. Our Ambassador<br />

there, Sir George Buchanan, had rendered very<br />

fine service, but the very fact that he had established excellent<br />

relations with the Imperial Government, and with the<br />

Provisional Government which replaced it, made him an<br />

object of suspicion and distrust to the new Administration<br />

which had now been set up under Kerensky, with the support<br />

of the Soviet. It was urged by the Foreign Office that he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!