07.06.2014 Views

Holloway - Crack Capitalism.pdf - Libcom

Holloway - Crack Capitalism.pdf - Libcom

Holloway - Crack Capitalism.pdf - Libcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IllId the huge growth of the cities in the last fifty years.2 However,<br />

II is not just a question of the creation of new private property,<br />

,Ind it is certainly not only on the margins of capitalism that<br />

primitive accumulation is relevant.3 The old, past, established<br />

property is also constantly at issue. Even the property of land<br />

l'nclosed three hundred years ago is constituted only through a<br />

process of constant reiteration, constantly renewed separation, or<br />

enclosure. Capital accumulation itself, the amassing of profits, is<br />

;1 constant process of separation of the producers from their own<br />

product and hence from the means of production. The actual<br />

and threatened violence required to produce and reproduce the<br />

separation of the producers from the means of production is<br />

possibly now far greater than anything that Marx even imagined.<br />

The enclosure of land and the respect for private property require<br />

an enormous army of people for their enforcement. If we count<br />

not only security guards, police and army, but also judges,<br />

lawyers, social workers and teachers (not to mention parents),<br />

then a very significant part of the world's population is engaged<br />

in the constantly reiterated separation of people from the means<br />

of production. The term 'dull compulsion of economic relations'<br />

does not do justice to the active and constantly contested nature<br />

of capitalist appropriation.4<br />

The same can be said not only of primitive accumulation<br />

in its narrow sense but of all the forms of social relations that<br />

are moments of the abstraction of labour. As Marcel Stoetzler<br />

(2009: 169) puts it in an article on the creation of the separation<br />

between women and men, 'When Hegel pointed to the daily<br />

reading of a particular paper as one of the reiterative acts that<br />

produce what looks like it has always been there, the same<br />

can be said of Renan's "daily plebiscites" and Judith Butler's<br />

daily acts of "performative reiteration" that produce the (real)<br />

illusion of sex.' Primitive accumulation can perhaps be said to<br />

be performative reiteration: in the same way as the separation<br />

(and thereby definition) of girls and boys is a product of constant<br />

repetition, so too the separation of people from the means of<br />

production is the result of the daily reiteration that constitutes<br />

private property as such.<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!