Conformally Invariant Variational Problems. - SAM
Conformally Invariant Variational Problems. - SAM
Conformally Invariant Variational Problems. - SAM
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
tangent frame field to T 2 . Define the energy<br />
∫<br />
min |(e 1 ,∇e 2 )| 2 dxdy ,<br />
ψ∈W 1,2 (D 2 ,R) D 2<br />
where (·,·) is the standard scalar product on R m , and<br />
(VII.26)<br />
e 1 (x,y)+ie 2 (x,y) := e iψ(x,y) (ẽ 1 (x,y)+iẽ 2 (x,y)) .<br />
We seek to optimize the map (ẽ) by minimizing this energy over<br />
the W 1,2 (D 2 )-maps taking values in the space of rotationsof the<br />
plane R 2 ≃ T u(x,y) T 2 . Our goal is to seek a frame field as regular<br />
as possible in which the harmonic map equation will be recast.<br />
The variational problem (VII.26) is well-posed, and it further<br />
admits a solution in W 1,2 . Indeed, there holds<br />
|(e 1 ,∇e 2 )| 2 = |∇ψ +(ẽ 1 ,∇ẽ 2 )| 2 .<br />
Hence, there exists a unique minimizer in W 1,2 which satisfies<br />
0 = div(∇ψ +(ẽ 1 ,∇ẽ 2 )) = div((e 1 ,∇e 2 )) . (VII.27)<br />
A priori, (e 1 ,∇e 2 ) belongs to L 2 . But actually, thanks to the<br />
careful selection brought in by the variational problem (VII.26),<br />
we shall discover that the frame field (e 1 ,∇e 2 ) over D 2 lies in<br />
W 1,1 , thereby improving the original L 2 belongingness 16 . Because<br />
the vector field (e 1 ,∇e 2 ) is divergence-free, there exists<br />
some function φ ∈ W 1,2 such that<br />
(e 1 ,∇e 2 ) = ∇ ⊥ φ . (VII.29)<br />
16 Further yet, owing to a result of Luc Tartar [Tar2], we know that W 1,1 (D 2 ) is continuously<br />
embedded in the Lorentz space L 2,1 (D 2 ), whose dual is the Marcinkiewicz weak-L 2<br />
space L 2,∞ (D 2 ), whose definition was recalled in (VI.9). A measurable function f is an<br />
element of L 2,1 (D 2 ) whenever<br />
∫ +∞<br />
0<br />
∣ { p ∈ D 2 ; |f(p)| > λ }∣ ∣ 1 2<br />
dλ .<br />
(VII.28)<br />
69