18.07.2014 Views

soil-conservation-people-religion-and-land.pdf - South West NRM

soil-conservation-people-religion-and-land.pdf - South West NRM

soil-conservation-people-religion-and-land.pdf - South West NRM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF<br />

D CARE<br />

THROUGH LOCAL GROUP ACTION<br />

Brian Roberts<br />

Darling Downs Institute of Advanced Education, Toowoomba<br />

I<br />

Backsround<br />

Farm Management is many things - it is managing finances,<br />

managing labour <strong>and</strong> above all, managing l<strong>and</strong>. This paper<br />

concerns the implementation of management of l<strong>and</strong> resources in<br />

such a way that production is not at the expense of the l<strong>and</strong>'s<br />

productive potential.<br />

In recent years there has been an increasing awakening on the<br />

part of governments <strong>and</strong> producer organizations, to the reality<br />

of loss of productrve capacity of agricultural <strong>and</strong> pastoral<br />

l<strong>and</strong>. There has also been a re-kindling of the concept of<br />

group action which was initiated in the late 1940s in several<br />

states.<br />

It is worth evaluating the progress made with the<br />

implementation of the recommendations of the interdepartmental<br />

committee (1978) on Australian <strong>soil</strong> <strong>conservation</strong><br />

policy (see Appendix 1) .*<br />

The 1978 survey remains the only national stock-taking of the<br />

state of l<strong>and</strong> degradation. The way in which the Federal <strong>and</strong><br />

State governments have reacted to these <strong>and</strong> other more recent<br />

recommendations, is the 3est barometer of the progress made in<br />

<strong>soil</strong> co.zservaticn <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> care. Thr sphcres identified for<br />

corrective action in 1978 were grouped as follows:<br />

I. Basic Recommendations.<br />

2. Commonwealth Action.<br />

3. Commonwealth-State Relations.<br />

4. -e Government Action.<br />

5. g=e-~egional-~ocal<br />

.---- ~elations.<br />

6. 6-1 Government.<br />

- . ---<br />

---- - ---<br />

While not assuming that the recommendations were comprehensive<br />

<strong>and</strong> well balanced, they form a useful framework within which<br />

to plan <strong>and</strong> implement group action by l<strong>and</strong>holders at local<br />

level. In summary it may be said that significantly better<br />

conditions have been created during the past decade for<br />

l<strong>and</strong>holders wishing to improve their l<strong>and</strong>, to do so either<br />

individually or as a catchment or shire group. Attention has<br />

been given to the taxation aspects of l<strong>and</strong> clearing <strong>and</strong> income<br />

equalization provisions are being considered. Funds have been<br />

made available for local demonstration <strong>and</strong> reclamation<br />

projects <strong>and</strong> in a number of ways, Federal government <strong>and</strong> some<br />

State governments have encouraged the establishment of<br />

l<strong>and</strong>holder committees supported by departmental specialists.<br />

* NDt included in this copy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!