20.10.2014 Views

Latin America; in English (pdf) - Transboundary Freshwater Dispute ...

Latin America; in English (pdf) - Transboundary Freshwater Dispute ...

Latin America; in English (pdf) - Transboundary Freshwater Dispute ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

there will be more resources available for basic<br />

sanitation services and education of water<br />

conservation practices. This, <strong>in</strong> turn, will reduce<br />

water pollution and stress on the bas<strong>in</strong>.<br />

3.2.4 Hydropolitical<br />

Vulnerability: The Silala,<br />

a Small-Scale Example<br />

The Silala, a shared river between Bolivia and<br />

Chile, is a current example of how political and<br />

socioeconomic forces can cause a dispute over a<br />

body of water (Figure 3.1). The two perspectives<br />

on this currently shared body of water differ and,<br />

as a result, the political, economic, and hydrological<br />

situation is suffer<strong>in</strong>g. This virtually unknown<br />

case illustrates the concept of hydropolitical<br />

vulnerability characterized <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>troduction to<br />

Figure 3.1 The Silala Bas<strong>in</strong>.<br />

this report as “the likelihood of conflict rises as<br />

the rate of change with<strong>in</strong> the bas<strong>in</strong> exceeds the<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional capacity to absorb that change,” on<br />

various levels.<br />

In 1908, the prefecture of the Bolivian<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ce of Potosí gave a concession of the<br />

waters of the Silala River to a Chilean railroad<br />

company known as the Antofagasta-Bolivian<br />

Railway Company (now called the Ferrocarril<br />

Antofagasta-Bolivia) for the use of the railroad<br />

that traveled between the city of Antofagasta,<br />

Chile, and Oruro, Bolivia.<br />

Bolivia asserts that Chile, <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g the water<br />

for the railroad, constructed a series of canals<br />

that made the waters come together and form<br />

the Silala River. Otherwise, the waters of the<br />

spr<strong>in</strong>gs would have stayed where they were <strong>in</strong><br />

Bolivian territory. In other words, Chile constructed<br />

a canal that moved the<br />

water artificially from Bolivia<br />

to Chile.<br />

When, <strong>in</strong> 1962, diesel<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>es replaced steampowered<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>es, the Silala<br />

waters were no longer used<br />

for the purpose for which<br />

the water concession was<br />

given (steam-powered<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>es) and the water was<br />

diverted for other uses such<br />

as m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and sanitation<br />

services. S<strong>in</strong>ce the concession<br />

of the Silala was not for<br />

such uses, Bolivia would like<br />

to charge Chile retroactively<br />

for the 40-plus years it has<br />

been us<strong>in</strong>g the waters<br />

(Toromoreno 2000).<br />

In 2000, the Bolivian<br />

government gave a concession<br />

for the Silala waters to<br />

a Bolivian company called<br />

DUCTEC SRL for $46.8<br />

million over 40 years.<br />

DUCTEC, <strong>in</strong> order to make<br />

money for what it paid for,<br />

decided to charge<br />

CODELCO, the Chilean<br />

national copper m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

company, and Ferrocarril<br />

64 — Hydropolitical Vulnerability and Resilience along International Waters: <strong>Lat<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>America</strong> and the Caribbean

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!