Europe - UNEP
Europe - UNEP
Europe - UNEP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fish market, Brugge, Belgium. Photo credit: Sandra Arbogast.<br />
diversion, or irrigation scheme—or in its political<br />
setting, especially the breakup of a nation that<br />
results in new international rivers. The second<br />
factor is that existing institutions are unable to<br />
absorb and effectively manage that change.<br />
This is typically the case when there is no treaty<br />
spelling out each nation’s rights and<br />
responsibilities with regard to the shared river,<br />
nor any implicit agreements or cooperative<br />
arrangements. Even the existence of technical<br />
working groups can provide some capability to<br />
manage contentious issues, as they have in the<br />
Middle East.<br />
The overarching lesson of the study is that<br />
unilateral actions to construct a dam or river<br />
diversion in the absence of a treaty or institutional<br />
mechanism that safeguards the interests of other<br />
countries in the basin is highly destabilizing to a<br />
region, often spurring decades of hostility before<br />
cooperation is pursued. In other words, the red<br />
flag for water-related tension between countries is<br />
not water stress per se, as it is within countries,<br />
but rather the unilateral exercise of domination of<br />
an international river, usually by a regional power.<br />
In the Jordan River Basin, for example,<br />
violence broke out in the mid-1960s over an “all-<br />
Arab” plan to divert the river’s headwaters (itself<br />
a pre-emptive move to thwart Israel’s intention to<br />
siphon water from the Sea of Galilee). Israel and<br />
Syria sporadically exchanged fire between March<br />
1965 and July 1966. Water-related tensions in<br />
the basin persisted for decades and only recently<br />
have begun to dissipate.<br />
A similar sequence of events transpired in<br />
the Nile basin, which is shared by 10 countries—<br />
of which Egypt is last in line. In the late 1950s,<br />
hostilities broke out between Egypt and Sudan<br />
over Egypt’s planned construction of the High<br />
Dam at Aswan. The signing of a treaty between<br />
the two countries in 1959 defused tensions<br />
before the dam was built. But no water-sharing<br />
agreement exists between Egypt and Ethiopia,<br />
where some 55% of the Nile’s flow originates,<br />
and a war of words has raged between these two<br />
nations for decades. As in the case of the Jordan,<br />
in recent years the Nile nations have begun to<br />
work cooperatively toward a solution thanks in<br />
part to unofficial dialogues among scientists and<br />
technical specialists that have been held since the<br />
early 1990s, and more recently a ministerial-level<br />
“Nile Basin Initiative” facilitated by the United<br />
Nations and the World Bank.<br />
1.2.2 Intranational Waters<br />
The second set of security issues occurs at the<br />
sub-national level. Much literature on trans-<br />
12 — Hydropolitical Vulnerability and Resilience along International Waters: <strong>Europe</strong>